TheOctonaut

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Lemmy 24/7: "if its free, you're the product"

Lemmy on Nintendo: "Why should I pay for online play?! It needs to be free, moderated, and exist indefinitely even after the obsolescence of the product. Otherwise, I'm entirely justified in pirating everything."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You will (probably) not pay a tariff in your life in much the same way that will not pay the Suez Canal fee, carbon tax, employers tax or municipal rates.

We get it, you're very clever and have figured out the absolutely bare minimum of economics that higher costs lead to higher prices. The original commenter was asking a technical question about a loophole and it's been answered. You don't actually have to contribute if you don't have anything relevant to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

We are specifically discussing the situation in which it makes a significant difference: items which were already imported. Someone asked a question if second hand items were somehow a loophole which indicated they needed an actual understanding of how tariffs are applied, not your vibes-based fluff.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (15 children)

...

It's absolutely not a contradiction, it's a technicality. You as a person will almost certainly not ever pay a tariff in your life. And there's a very small chance that a supplier might partially or entirely cover the tariff, either to retain customers during what they might hope is a temporary policy, or to undercut competitors.

I get why you want to say what you're saying though.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (18 children)

Tariffs are a fee you pay to import something. The assumption of the meme is that you're buying something second hand that was imported before the tariffs (or after, it doesn't matter, you're not importing it).

I mean, 99% of the time you're not the one doing the importing anyway so you don't actually pay the tariff but the company you're buying from will, and will almost certainly increase the price to make up for the higher cost to supply.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A controller that is useful only when you have that online subscription to play the back catalogue, yes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What type of rock is a penguin, pick boy

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

People are answering your headline but not understanding your question; the two aren't as linked as they would be in French.

All of these are valid:

  • I went to a Moscow school
  • I went to a school in Moscow
  • I went to a Versaille cafe
  • I went to a cafe in Versaille.
  • I dated a London girl
  • I dated a girl from London

These sound more natural than the following:

  • I went to a Muscovite school
  • I went to a Versaillian cafe (People have been giving you the direct French for Versaillais, but English wouldn't use fhat)
  • I dated a Londoner girl.

At least for Muscovite, it retains the implication that the school is for people from Moscow, rather than the school being in Moscow. You could have a Muscovite school in London. You could have a Versaillian cafe in Osaka.

You can see this a lot more often in religion, eg. I went to a Presbyterian school - I went to a school for Presbyterians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You missed the point and wrote like 3.5 paragraphs. Maybe AI could summarise for you. I asked Gemini to give it a go:

This comic strip conveys a cautionary message about the potential overconfidence of humans regarding the irreplaceable nature of their professions in the face of advancing technology, specifically artificial intelligence. Here's a breakdown:

  • The first five panels show various people confidently stating that their professions (cook, driver, lawyer, doctor, teacher) are inherently human, rely on talent, and therefore cannot be replaced. They seem to believe they are immune to automation or technological disruption.

  • The remaining four panels reveal identical, faceless robots labeled with other professions (personal, journalist, artist, translator). This visually suggests that even roles considered creative, nuanced, or requiring "human touch" are susceptible to being taken over by AI or robots.

  • The humor lies in the dramatic irony. The characters' confident assertions are juxtaposed with the stark reality of the robots, highlighting the potential for human hubris in underestimating the capabilities of emerging technologies. In essence, the comic warns against complacency and suggests that many professions, even those requiring creativity and human interaction, might not be as safe from automation as people believe. It prompts reflection on the evolving nature of work and the potential impact of AI on various fields.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes. Those Irish Islamists. Always demanding Sharia law.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Our other trade partner also went batshit about 10 years ago and made it a lot more difficult to trade with them.

Life's lonely as a relatively norma neutrall northern-hemisphere anglophone state.

view more: next ›