It isn't, at work we're in the process of evaluating how useful it can be and a bunch of people received Cursor licenses to test it out.
If you're trying to do something common it works great as long as you are concise enough. The moment you try to get it to do something obscure it starts failing miserably.
It is perfectly fair in the context of "fuel", a resource used to produce energy. Whether energy is generated via chemical or nuclear reaction is irrelavent in this case.
Paying somone else to advertise for you. You yourself holding up a sign promoting yourself is fine, paying someone else to hold up a sign for you is illegal.
how so
And since Arch is rolling release it's python-lib, not python3-lib. :)
I basically never audit ANY software I use. I trust those in communities I frequent that say they have.
If you can't audit the code then it's closed source and not FOSS.
I fully support returning to Latin. Dulce est desipere in loco!
I don't get it with these. If it's FOSS why would the country of origin matter? All source is available and anyone can freely fork it? You don't even pay anything in the first place so not like boycotting these types of projects has any effect?
Problem is that distro1 has req-lib2.5.3 while distro2 has req-lib2.7.8, but your project was developed on distro3 with req-lib2.9.5 so you have to deal with every distro having different lib versions and compatibility issues that come with it, not just different packaging formats.
Didn't know about that, how exactly is that implemented?
The same was said with Ukraine. The pot with China is going to keep itself stirring as long as Taiwan remains independent.