NAT provides no firewall features and we can have a discussion about how wrong that statement is
Scoopta
Yeah, they should publish on f-droid or direct APK as well
EDIT: Just remembered the new android "feature" that restricts what apps you can install from off the play store to Google approved ones...still worth doing for those of us on AOSP OSes
Graphene supports running GMS in a sandbox like any normal app. That's what I do as there are too many apps in the play store I need
Can't disagree there. I don't even use it, I just prefer when people take a stand
Tbf they say windows is WIP and they support Mac which has an even lower bar than windows IMO
This is a mistake, they should just refuse service in all markets that do this, that's the only way you get enough public backlash to make a change
With XMPP all messages are relayed through your server of choice
I never said you couldn't, just that it doesn't work that way now
Because with Lemmy's architecture darknet sites could not federate with clearnet sites as the end user's browser fetches content directly from the federated instances.
The problem is if this gets adopted on a large enough scale not even Tor will save us, all the exit nodes will be subject to censorship. Tor only works because there are some countries which have totally free and open internet. Unless you're talking about moving completely to the darknet.
That's cool. Mine is just an interpreter for execution but it has breakpoints, watchpoints, and save states. I've thought about trying to do some form of JIT or at least AOT but I haven't yet made an attempt. Besides for a debugger that's counter productive.
Except in the UK where the government is on the left. This seems to be one situation where both the right and the left are universally looking to screw over their citizens and there has to be some way we can stop it.