this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3222 readers
85 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Because with Lemmy's architecture darknet sites could not federate with clearnet sites as the end user's browser fetches content directly from the federated instances.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because with Lemmy’s architecture darknet sites could not federate with clearnet sites as the end user’s browser fetches content directly from the federated instances.

Ehhh, that just seems like something someone hasn't fixed yet but easily could if built for that purpose. No one's taken a hammer to that nail yet.

A tunnel could exist on each server that relays to TOR and back to the instance, allowing it to federate with .onion instances under an alias or something. TOR is extremely flexible with tunneling and being really specific with what you let in and from where. I could see how it could be tailored to the purpose.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right, but why not build it from the ground up to support the dark web?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I never said you couldn't, just that it doesn't work that way now