What do you call someone who allows threats of physical violence to communists. Clue: their kind murdered millions of communists in WW2!
Riverside
Sure. I can point you to it: I was threatened with physical violence by a nationalist and I got banned for it (the person who threatened me wasn't)
I'm in deep shame and horror that the military bases in my homeland of Spain were instrumental in the transporting of US aircraft, so I get it.
Tankie is a left-punching slur against Marxist-Leninists, which I choose to appropriate. We call liberals "libs", not dronies despite them supporting Obama even when he was murdering civilians in the middle east using drones. As for the stomping of the antisemitic pogroms in the post-fascist 1956 Hungary, I refer you to comrade Cowbee since they are a lot more well-versed in the topic than I am.
I'm proud of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology that uplifted a billion people from destitute poverty and colonialism towards industrialization, grantez universal healthcare and free education to the highest level, guarantees jobs and housing to every person, tripled life expectancy where it was allowed to exist, and saved Europe from Nazism.
Zionists and bombing hospitals, name a more iconic duo
every human life, even the Russians
Least russophobic German
Only country in the middle east confronting the genocidal Zionist entity.
I recommend you check out the analysis carried out by osint as explained by @MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net
Analysis here
They're not committing genocide or invading neighboring countries, already orders of magnitude better than the Zionists
How many are civilians on each war, don't move the goalposts
What hypothetical? Iran bombed Israel in the 12-day war and is currently bombing it in the new iteration of Operation True Promise. If Netanyahu gets disassembled I'll be celebrating
If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I'd be making the same accusation. It happened on piefed, though, no need for hypotheticals.