ReversalHatchery

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

I guess the point is more about the leadership, who has the control, who are the majority, and not purism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

NAS shared folders

now that is something that can easily make the system unstable, especially a laptop that will disconnect from the network at least ince in a while. my experience is with KDE, that if there's an unresponsive SMB mount 8n the filesystem, the whole KDE plasma environment fill freeze left and right, maybe with the exception of the window manager. but I have experienced this with other programs too. I suspect they all do filesystem accesses on the main thread and that's why when a directory read hangs, they can't do anything even handle clicksuntil the read times out.

its infuriating honestly, in a sense. of course, I have got all my money back lol. but it's like nobody is testing software with SMB shares, but I guess probably same goes for NFS, SSHFS or anything remote

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I'm already running too many browsers in some trenchcoat on the desktop.

Anyway it;s a client server architecture

that does not warrant a browser. not only JS can do HTTP requests

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if we can keep using cash mostly anywhere, this is good news

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The comment about the US was more about the fact that they wouldn't have the same obligations to expose users or implement backdoors as what this regulation is asking, and that's true.

true true, not the same ones, different ones. like national security letters and warrants and the like

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

source: [removed]

I assume this is poster's seelf deletion because otherwise more of the post would be gone including title and creator. is this a smear campaign?

I mean, things we have seen in the past does not inspire a lot of trust, but what is this?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

anyone who thinks web tech is best practice on the fucking desktop should be expelled from the whole field

said ford would consume way too much gas and produce way too much noise, among other things. but what's the problem with the current installer? that it doesn't have curly corners, and that it has too many options which is confusing to those with no reading comprehension?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

sure making a new installer from scratch, whats more with web tech, is definitely easier than fixing the existing solution thats almost perfect

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

no need to learn chinese whwn they can just pick a nice European language

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really don't want to switch US tech to a Chinese one. that country is really not any better, unless you see everyday mass surveillance and the loss of personal privacy as the way to go

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

that's good to know, I'll try this. for some reason firefox always tries to recommend facebook as the first thing when I start typing something similar, even though I left it 5+ years ago

 

Recently there was a post where the OP pitched an idea for a service related to this community. I don't want to go into details but the post's text has shown that maybe there's some misunderstanding around the technology, and a considerable amount of us also thought that it's not a good idea.
The post was removed (noticed because I couldn't reply to someone) probably because the OP felt shame for their "failed" idea, but I think we shouldn't delete posts for reasons like this.

The post created an interesting discussion around the idea with useful info. It's useful to have things like these for future reference, for similar discussions in the future.
This is an anonymous forum, so there's no shame in recommending things, when you do that politely like it was done in that case.

view more: next ›