this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
970 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86930 readers
3172 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a terrible thing that’s happened, but fuck gadgetreview for that shitty misleading clickbait headline.

Editor knew they wouldn’t get the same impact with “teacher posted in a group chat that they were going to shoot a student”, so “group” becomes “private” and the detail about the threat gets moved way down into the article body. This is a journal who clearly wants to tell you what to think.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A group chat between 4 people should be just as private of a chat than between two people. Private isn't a quantity, you can have a private chat with 100 people if you wanted. However clearly none of its actually private.

[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

This is so disturbingly common. Remember the dad that sent a picture to his son's pediatrician?

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

And in any other country that may have been correctly classed as a joke, but in the US it ain't a joke. What a dystopia

[–] antiphon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to tell everyone to uninstall their apps.. Oh, wait. We already did that.

It's pretty incredible how we leave digital footprints everywhere. Like the Device IDs that Windows uses on Win 11/10. They can find you pretty easily based on just that alone.

[–] kazerniel@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Very disturbing, it was the last straw to switch my chats (besides family) to Signal.

I had held onto Telegram for years because of their fun animated stickers, but yesterday discovered that Signal has those too, actually all sets from Telegram are available on unofficial Signal sticker sites, so now I'm all sorted 😅

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The animated stickers on signal are trash in comparison and there are only a fraction as many, like 120 or so in total if I just counted correctly.

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

For anyone that doesn't know this yet, Telegram isn't secure - your messages are decrypted in the middle, on their servers. It's a shame they've got such a fun app otherwise

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Funny that I have it the other way around. My entire fam on Signal and few (only close) friends on here

[–] kazerniel@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

my family still uses Facebook Messenger, it's only the tech savvier people I hung out with on Telegram that I managed to switch to Signal 😮‍💨

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 1 day ago (9 children)

So the lesson to the rest of us is DO NOT USE SNAPCHAT especially for private messaging.

I use Signal, was pressed to do so by privacy-minded friends and have pressed other friends to adopt the client.

So long as you don't accidentally include Jeffrey Goldberg in your chat, you're okay.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

The duality of AI....one stops nonexistent threats another one happily puts you into danger

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 92 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Questions for the ridiculous number of people on here who are perfectly willing to give up their right to privacy because you believe it makes schools and other places safer:

Have you read the 50+ page user agreement for your cell phone company? How about the user agreements of every app that has access to your cell phone, your PC mic or apps that have access to your files? Late model cars have microphones too, as do TV remotes. Microsoft has access to everything on your Windows PC. I'd give 100 to 1 odds that 99% of you haven't read any of those user agreements OR the UA for private chat apps you are using. Likewise are you sure any cloud storage you're using isn't scanning your documents for forbidden phrases?

Since you haven't read every word of each and every user agreement and think it keeps schools safe, you should be just fine with the fact that EVERYTHING you say or write may be available to law enforcement, even if you're talking to yourself while sitting on the toilet in your home. If you mutter that you'd like to kill someone or burn something misheard as a school building to the ground you are just fine with AI flagging it and the police knocking on your door in an hour, right? You'll also be just fine with losing your career and your job never being able to find another one, right? Right? After all, other people never know WTF someone dangerous and violent is going to do.

The number of people on here who are perfectly willing to give up all their rights and have their private communications monitored for something that is nothing more than security theater is unbelievable.

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Very well said! Privacy protects the innocent far more than it protects the guilty, and no false positive rate other than zero is acceptable when ‘van bursts in to take your career away over an AI detecting wrongdoing’ in my view.

If a false positive rate of zero is not possible then not building it is the only ethical option.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] someone@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm glad this person's life was semi-ruined by using big tech.

I am tired of normies using horrible platforms and then acting Pikachu-level shocked when they have horrible privacy violations.

Tech illiteracy + Big tech exploiting tech illiteracy = profit and constant surveilance

and normies are too damn stupid to get it, and every once in a while one of them gets fucked, and then... suddenly... nothing changes yet again

and these normies with their acceptance of any TOS, even the shittiest of shit, and making opting out some sort of social misstep, like "What?! You really don't use WhatsApp?" with an ugly look, means I am glad these assholes occasionally suffer for their ignorance

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What a fucking ghoul.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

You're so unique and smart.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've been slowly dragging my family kicking and screaming away from surveillance state shenanigans but it's hard.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It really is. I get the sentiment that there can be schadenfreude.

load more comments
view more: next ›