Ooops

Arch live ISO gives you arch-chroot which does all the binds automatically

That isn't neccessary. nvidia-open automatically replaced nvidia (same for nvidia-open-dkms, nvidia-open-utils etc) when 590 hit and installing any of those nvidia-580xx packages will ask to remove them because they conflict.

It should be illegal to use pacman without pacman-contrib installed for checkupdates (no risk of partial upgrades) and for comparing and merging .pacnew-files with pacdiff...

While the distinction can be important, the snapshots from right before the update are exactly what you want in this case over some actual but always somewhat outdated real backup

"Doesn't help" is a bit unspecific for an actual answer.

I simply installed nvidia-580xx-dkms and nvidia-580xx-utils and that was all. If you did not already use the dkms-driver package before you of course also need <your kernel>-headers and dkms (but the latter should be pulled as a dependency for nvidia-580xx-dkms anyway)...

Which automatically asks for the removal of nvidia-open (the standard package for the base linux kernel) or nvidia-open-dkms and nvidia-open-utils that replaced the earlier nvidia, nvidia-dkms, nvidia-utils packages when 590 hit.

PS: If you still have stuff using 32bit add (you might have guessed the scheme by now...) lib32-nvidia-580xx-utils to replace lib32-nvidia-open-utils

nvidia was automatically replaced with nvidia-open (also nvidia-open-lts, nvidia-open-dkms etc).

Simply installing nvidia-580xx-dkms, nvidia-580xx-utils (and lib32-nvidia-580xx-utils because Steam still needs all that 32bit stuff), which automatically removes the 590-open stuff because of conflicts, should be all you need to do.

PS: And of course your kernel's header package if you did not use dkms before... (dkms should be pulled as a dependency automatically)

What couldn't Europe do? They are easily ⅔ of NATO in equipment and soldiers. What the US is bringing is mostly the logistics for force projection over-seas. And they increase the number of nukes from enough to destroy the world a few times to a hundred times. Which is totally irrelevant for Europe defending against a country in Europe (that's where the relevant parts of Russia are) on European soil.

People have spend to much time soaking up US propaganda about how they are all paying for Europe's defense. Just the non-US part of NATO is still on a completely different level than Russia. And the few categories where they can somewhat compete still requires to value every single piece of ancient ex-soviet equipment as equal to modern western stuff. They also spend (in today's war time conditions) a fraction of Europe's 2020s defense budget.

So an actual war with Europe instead of screaming Russian propagandists telling funny fairy tales about being "at war with NATO" for years now is consequence enough.

Wikipedia isn't a source. It's a summary as a starting point at best.

But the good thing is: they actually list sources.

Geplant ist, dass die Demos ab jetzt ein Mal im Monat stattfinden. Bis der Bundesrat sich aktiv für ein Prüfverfahren von rechtsextremen Parteien einsetzt.

Ist ja nett gemeint, aber Samstagsdemos, selbst solche von viel größeren Dimensionen, können und werden unsere Politiker unbegrenzt lange ignorieren.

Weil das im Diskurs gern ignoriert wird und dann die üblichen Verdächtigen fragen, wieso das überhaupt die EU bestimmt:

Deutschland kann natürlich in Wahrheit so viele Gaskraftwerke bauen, wie man möchte. Wenn man denn jemanden findet, der das ohne massive Subventionen tut... die sind wegen des EU-weiten Strommarktes nämlich begrenzt.

Ach gäbe es doch nur Möglichkeiten preiswert Energie zu erzeugen, die keine extra Subventionen benötigen und rein von der Privatwirtschaft finanziert werden...

Nee, ich erkläre Dinge nur für Menschen, die an Erklärungen interessiert sind. Meine Zeit ist mir zu kostbar, um weiter als stumpfer Stichwortgeber für deine vorgefertigten ideologischen Auswüchse zu dienen.

I wonder if there is a single country in Europe ready to receive the amount of Shahed drones Ukraine receives almost daily.

Yes, all of them in fact. It's called deterrence.

Nobody is building systems to constanty destroy hundreds of drones each day. Just like no one (but a few very persistent morons) builds walls to keep attackers away. The actual protection is the consequences for the attacker. Guess what Ukraine would pick between ten thousands of anti-air systems (the amount you would need to protect an actual country, not just some points of strategic interest) and EU-/NATO-membership.