Jedikkeneus

joined 2 weeks ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago

Does it precede your ability to answer the question without giving an irrelevant remark though?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 20 hours ago

Think a certain community if a certain day was a thing, all day every day.

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well now that you've asked, there's a connection issue. But the community in question goes by a different style of expression anyways. The two communities aren't really in a state of competition since they cater differently. Think of it as the uno reverso to the other one.

That much I did in a way. The small patio or opening outside the back door is closed off and has den features, and I left an old flat container out with water in it as well as some nuts.

 

I was in the yard of an old place of residence. One of the squirrels happened to have made its legs useless, presumably from a fall. As one can see, I recorded it trying to run from me (and failing; don't worry, I just startled it and didn't do anything to it) as I stepped out of the backyard door. What would you advise?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

Has he not heard of Ocarina of Time?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

How would they know he got someone else's results just via one phone call?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Alright. Sorry about that.

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Speak for yourself and your own mentally documented behaviors (which I say partially literally, as that's what this place is for, unless you just came to mock). Nobody is denying the Jedikkeneus and ShinigamiOokamiRyuu names have a driving force in common, but several people can attest the other names involved have no such connection to one another, even if administrators in some places who are infamous for their unreliability (and confessed inability to verify themselves) claim otherwise. Funny how people avoid dumping others' personal information and fingerprints when it proves them wrong on something, eh?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Why are you asking?

[–] Jedikkeneus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

And how would you know what the OP is talking about? Especially considering you are wrong about the supposed alts (with one exception) and the viewpoints and intents of the people you claim to speak for.

I wasn't baiting anyone. It was an honest inquiry and could've at least been answered from afar if anyone was afraid of stepping up to do so. And I have a seven-day-old name, so what? Whatever number of days old it was, the complaint would just adapt to that number to fit the needs of the complainer.

 

Let's say you make an association, and it aims to address errors in records that are supposed to detail wrongdoing. Naturally the same scrutiny extends to reports, right?

Let's say you have two sides that are at odds. However, they both recount things differently or interpret the same events differently. You would ask for proof, right?

My question for a certain @frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world is, do you have any smoking guns? All I see are arguments over pedantic details and claims where the so-called evidence is no more conclusive than the verdict at the beginning of 12 Angry Men (or My Cousin Vinny if you want to use a more fun example).

Some people have complained of others going around reporting everything they say in certain communities as a way to get them banned everywhere, often depending on the mods' carelessness over relevance or investigation.

view more: next ›