Oh I can definitely get behind that, I have my gripes with how the current climate consensus is insidiously stacked to give policymakers leeway and mislead the public with this bullshit.
I'm reading through it now and this part on NGFS reports really captures the sentiment:
This is analogous to carrying out a risk assessment of the impact of the Titanic hitting an iceberg but excluding from our model the possibility that the ship could sink, the shortage of lifeboats, and death from drowning or hypothermia.
As much as I hate talking about 'duh economee' when it comes to climate change (a thing that threatens the existence of us and many other beings) this report nails it.
Also the critical observations are good talking points when dealing with deniers/idiots
Oh god youre the person behind all the legacy codebases I've maintained