Fallibilist

That's why I only eat them twice a week.

I know it's not the healthiest of the foods but being Finnish chicken it's at least not seasoned with literal poison and considering that I airfry them it's at least better than deepfryed. Let me have my wings and comforting lies. Cooking and eating is such a struggle for me.

That place seems to be still under construction. I bet that truck belongs to one of the people working there.

Who says that and what does it have to do with Facebook and Instagram?

You're asking me to list you examples of situations in which being physically strong is advantageous as if the answer is not obvious to literally everyone. Then I go check your message history only to discover the complete absence of even a single comment discussing anything of substance. My apologies if I've grown sensitive to the obvious signs when someone is not engaging in good faith and thus don't waste my time answering their pointless questions.

If you truly can't think of a situation in which having more strength is advantageous then I don't think anything I say is going to change that.

It doesn't - untill it does.

Yeah, so you might be able to juggle and drive an unicycle at the same time but you still can't write code or fill an excel sheet while answering to an email.

It's only a matter of time until AI will be a better driver, pilot, captain and operator of any other machine you can think of. These systems are already good and they will only keep getting better. This is the worst they'll ever be. It doesn't mean that they'll ever be flawless but the bar to reach is better-than-humans and that's not a very high bar. Waymo and Tesla FSD are probably past that already or for the very least will soon be.

Of course one can still refuse to step in a vehicle not operated by a human but at some point this becomes equivalent to knowingly stepping into the objectively more dangerous vehicle purely out of stubbornness.

It's still morally wrong in the absolute sense since you're taking something for free that you're implicitly expected to pay for. However if there is no way for you to actually pay for it even if you wanted then that makes this one of the clearer cases in which one can morally defend piracy. It's still not right but it's less wrong.

The only scenario that I can think of that would be even more clear is when you've actually bought the media already but the disc got damaged for example as was the case with my GTA San Andreas back in the day: I had bought the game but the disc exploded in the drive so I was forced to crack it so that I could play without the disc.

No. That's kind of the point of the platform. Each instance has their own admins and mods.

I don't get it either. Seems like mostly just a novelty item. I sometimes get the feeling that smartphones have become pretty much as good as they can get in this current form and manufacturers are just trying to come up with imaginary problems to solve in order to stand out somehow.

Just buy any mid-range Android (or and older iPhone) and you'll get a great device that does everything it needs to and you can stop thinking about whatever the next year's release does marginally better than the device you have now and use that mental energy on something else.

This isn't about me.