It bled, there are photos of it bleeding. We have all seen it.
A wound like that doesn't need to leave a big scar. Sure, some doctor might have been lying about the "2cm wide wound" but that's not surprising at all. We know they're liars and there will be misinformation around the event, but that doesn't mean the wound didn't exist. Head wounds bleed a lot even if they're very small.
You don't have anything except a tendency to confirm your pre-existing beliefs.
I would explain the lack of ear injury by saying that there was an ear injury.
Cool story but nobody has to listen to you if you can't be bothered to substantiate anything.
Conspiratorial thinking is evidence of and leads to very disordered thinking. You can carry on with it if you want, I'm not your cult leader and I don't have any say in how deranged you get.
A centrist is just a conservative who knows that "conservative" is a bad word.
With evidence, please. "I reckon" is not good enough. There is no evidence that anyone coordinated this at all.
Like fuck Trump, but if they staged it why would the shooter be a disaffected conservative and not some antifa supersoldier or whatever? Like they're playing out their fantasies and apparently they can construct whatever reality they feel like, why muddy the waters in any way?
I'm sorry, the reality in which the dude just sucked, the secret service kind of suck at their job, and the bullet grazed Trump's ear rather than going into his brain from sheer dumb luck is a messy, shitty, scary place where nobody really calls the shots, but it turns out that's probably the one we live in.
There's a point I've heard that the kind of slop that gen AI can be used for is good for fascists, because they're not trying to say anything or make it cohesive, they just want a glut of vague sentiments they're agreeable to, and gen AI can give them that without having to deal with pesky artists who have thoughts of their own like, "what you want is bad, actually," "maybe fuck you," and "I will stab you in the eye with my pencil."
I think it can fall under the same umbrella if their health is failing - it certainly follows the same logic of getting rid of the useless eaters.
But strictly speaking it doesn't affect the gene pool, so you're right about that.
Nah, that's some eugenics bullshit. People don't lose value just because their health is failing. They're still people.
What her health does change is the threat that she posed.
Explain why you as a trained officer need a taser to subdue a 95 year old frail woman who needs a walker.
Just literally take a step back, or grab her wrist. It's not hard.
I've never understood this idea of having an etiquette telling people how they "should" use their vote. If voting means anything, then people get to use their vote however they want. They can do it by dice roll if they feel like it.
Now remember, if you dislike this comment, according to your own logic, that's not a good reason to downvote it.
I don't know anything about this series, so I had to do a search to be sure all the colours lined up, and I'm still only about 90% sure about it, but here's the word you needed to include so that the uninitiated know what you're talking about:
"Pokemon"
It's honestly amazing that you wrote all of that and never named the series you were talking about. It was extra confusing that you called it a "game it color" when I'm pretty sure you mean "game boy color".
Iggity-iggit-ig-ig-ig-uhhh, don't mind the flag.
That's actually a real strategy that stutterers use to get around hard phrases, they just rephrase what they mean.
Description: An iconified image of a space helmet, with text underneath reading:
MURDERING ALL CITIZENS IS NOT REQUIRED.
No context has been provided.
Description: picture of youtube poll, mostly text
Kyle Hill
Schrodinger's cat is:
Alive -- 50%
Dead -- 50%
42K votes
Comments
I love how this community knew exactly what to do.
Also, I just want to add: they picked an easily manipulated, disposable kid, and told him to shoot near but not hit Trump? Is that the story you're going with?
Or what, there was no bullet, the injured people in the crowd were actors, they killed that guy later, the photo of the bullet was manipulated, and they just made sure they got to the shooter first to replace the blanks with real rounds?
Your theory either relies on the hypercompetence of a disposable kid to not actually kill Trump, or you're enlisting a lot of extra people who all have to be kept quiet now, forever, all for the sake of a single moment of manufactured drama.
Which one is it? Or is there a secret third option?