Darkassassin07

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, that is my response and I stand by it.

Some applications take advantage of the full widescreen, some don't need it. It's entirely up to you to use the additional space for something else when a single application doesn't need the extra space given to it or you just accept that it's not needed right now.

It's not the user's fault.

Yes, it is the users fault. Because the user is whining that not every single application and piece of media is the exact same form factor like that's at all a reasonable expectation.

You're seriously upset that sometimes you've got more space available than absolutely necessary?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I don't think widescreens exist "primarily for additional tasks in an office setting"

Perhaps I worded this poorly.

In an office settting; the primary use of a wide display is to have multiple tasks/windows open. An email your composing beside a document you're referencing for example.

My main point here is the additional space is there for you when you want it, instead of being missing when it's needed.

Saying "You're using it wrong" is blaming the user for using the computer the way it was presented out of the box.

You've gotta cater to the lowest common denominator there unfortunately. Things like this are presented in a simple easy to understand format, so that as many people as possible can get started with minimal help. Some people excel and explore the limits of their systems and what they can do with it; others don't get past 'computer basics 101' while using their computers for little more than a web browser.

"you're using it wrong" is a bit harsh. What you're doing isn't wrong, more like "there's more you could do to utilize the technology you have available".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

So stop using monitors the way I've been using them since 1982?

Yes. Technology has grown and expanded rapidly over those 43 years. You should also be changing with time to take advantage of such technological growth.

Stop using them the way that literally every other screen I interact with functions?

Your other screens can be used to multi task as well. Phones/tablets have picture-in-picture and app split-screen (both of which I use frequently).

TVs are admittedly geared towards single wide screen tasks like the obvious: media consumption. Though some smart TVs will also let you web browse while watching TV. And I'm pretty sure game consoles that facilitate streaming allow you to display chat over or beside the game.

That's what 2nd and 3rd monitors are for.

That's what additional monitors can be used for; but the point is with a single wide monitor you don't have to run a second monitor. You already have that additional space available when/if you want it.

Sure, I'm usually viewing a single window; but there's plenty of times when I want to open multiple applications side by side. I also play games and watch media; both of which are widescreen experiences. You might not need it 100% of the time, but it's there when you do.

That's not so easy when you're using multiple curved monitors with a stand or mount.

You've got tons of screen real estate to work with then; what's your concern? You could mount one vertically, you could use different sized displays, you could stack them.

Nobody's forced you to stick with the setup you have. If you wamt something different, set things up differently; it's your setup. Don't trap yourself in a box thinking you can only set things up or use them the way you've seen others do it. Be your own person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (15 children)

they just don't take advantage of the extra space on their own. A wide monitor allows you to put multiple windows side-by-side without the expense of an additional monitor though.

A square monitor is much more limited.

Stop making a single browser window full screen and use the additional space on the side for something useful. A chat application, a notepad, a calculator, file browsing, a second browser window, documents, etc.

Or rotate the display to be tall instead of wide if you really want the extra vertical space.

Just because you haven't bothered to take advantage of the space doesn't mean it's useless. You've just trapped yourself in a close-minded box. Making the monitor wider doesn't 'reduce the amount of viewable area top to bottom', it adds additional area to the sides, primarily for additional tasks in an office setting. It's up to you to actually use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rotate your wide monitor to be tall.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

A square monitor the same width as a widescreen is 77% larger overall = more expensive. (both in terms of materials and horsepower to run it)

There's not enough benefit to justify the cost of stretching both dimensions; we use the width more than the height.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (25 children)

the most commonly used workplace productivity apps are less useful in landscape mode.

They aren't less useful, they just don't take advantage of the extra space on their own. A wide monitor allows you to put multiple windows side-by-side without the expense of an additional monitor though.

With that in mind; a wide monitor is useful for document editing, web browsing, media viewing/production, gaming, and can even be rotated (stand/mount permitting) for a tall view if desired.

A square monitor is much more limited.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

+1 for Bitwarden

If you're into self-hosting, you can host the server yourself using Vaultwarden and get all the premium features for free. (make sure you implement a backup solution, ensuring that you don't lose your DB if your server dies is up to you)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems pretty accurate tbh.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What part of this is satire?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

Provide them with a clean safe space where they're comfortable; or they'll do it anyway in secret.

You're not going to stop them, if that's your goal; you'll only alienate your son in the process.

[–] [email protected] 281 points 3 days ago (14 children)

I fucking hate America.

A billionaire can hold a multi-million dollar lottery, where the only way to enter is to vote for who he wants; but you can and will be arrested for handing someone a bottle of water while they wait in line to vote.

53
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hexbear lost their domain (It's currently up for auction), and have moved to chapo.chat

Pretty sure we're defederated from hexbear, thought id pass on the new name to be re-defederated if it hasn't been already.

26
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Got a couple rpi 3Bs I'd like to use headless.

Downloaded 32bit pi os lite, flashed it to an sd card, powered on and did the initial setup (select keyboard layout, set first user+pass).

As soon as I'm dropped into a shell, I run 'sudo apt update' then 'sudo apt upgrade -y'.

Once these finish, I type 'sudo reboot'; the pi reboots, shows the rainbow splash, about a dozen lines of kernal boot messages then the video output dies and after a couple seconds the act light stops flashing too. Disconnecting power and powering it again does the same thing.

I don't think it's hardware failure as I get the same results with both 3Bs and with a 4B.

I don't know what to do from here.

I've spent the last 6 hours retrying this with both the 32 and 64 bit versions of pi os light. I can't get past the initial update/upgrade.

Anyone got any ideas? Anyone got a spare sd card, a pi 3B, and some free time to see if I'm just stupid somehow? I don't understand what I'm doing wrong.

/edit: RESULTS!

I can only assume this was a bad sd card. Tried a different card, with the exact same procedure: it finally booted after an upgrade.

Ran the update/upgrade again + a dist-upgrade and a couple more reboots. Up and running.

Excuse me while I go grab an image of that working card to file away.

 

Got a couple rpi 3Bs I'd like to use headless.

Downloaded 32bit pi os lite, flashed it to an sd card, powered on and did the initial setup (select keyboard layout, set first user+pass).

As soon as I'm dropped into a shell, I run 'sudo apt update' then 'sudo apt upgrade -y'.

Once these finish, I type 'sudo reboot'; the pi reboots, shows the rainbow splash, about a dozen lines of kernal boot messages then the video output dies and after a couple seconds the act light stops flashing too. Disconnecting power and powering it again does the same thing.

I don't know what to do from here.

I've spent the last 6 hours retrying this with both the 32 and 64 bit versions of pi os light. I can't get past the initial update/upgrade.

/edit: RESULTS!

Bad sd card. Tried a different one and all is well.

 
 
31
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Are any of you aware of projects similar to DizqueTV; a HDHomeRun tuner simulator that creates simulated live tv channels? (Dizque depends on Plex integration and cannot be used without it)

I'm looking for a solution to create simulated 'tv' channels by defining local content to be played on a schedule. Ideally just selecting a few shows to be played, mixed together. These channels would then be added to Emby/Plex/Jellyfin for users to tune into just like regular livetv.

I've been keeping an eye on Dizque for over a year now awaiting plex independence, but I don't think that'll be anytime soon. Wondering if there's alternatives.

/edit; should probably link the project I'm talking about...

https://github.com/vexorian/dizquetv

 

https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr/issues/10121

It's been months; is this getting addressed at all, or are we just forgoing IMDB now...?

This was my main method of automatically grabbing new content, but it's been entirely broken since June.

 

In the last couple of weeks, I've started getting this error ~1/5 times when I try to open one of my own locally hosted services.

I've never used ECH, and have always explicitly restricted nginx to TLS1.2 which doesn't support it. Why am I suddenly getting this, why is it randomly erroring, then working just fine again 2min later, and how can I prevent it altogether? Is anyone else experiencing this?

I'm primarily noticing it with Ombi. I'm also mainly using Chrome Android for this. But, checking just now; DuckDuckGo loads the page just fine everytime, and Firefox is flat out refusing to load it at all.

Firefox refuses to show the cert it claims is invalid, and 'accept and continue' just re-loads this error page. Chrome will show the cert; and it's the correct, valid cert from LE.

There's 20+ services going through the same nginx proxy, all using the same wildcard cert and identical ssl configurations; but Ombi is the only one suddenly giving me this issue regularly.

The vast majority of my services are accessed via lan/vpn; I don't need or want ECH, though I'd like to keep a basic https setup at least.

Solution: replace local A/AAAA records with a CNAME record pointing to a local only domain with its own local A/AAAA records. See below comments for clarification.

view more: ‹ prev next ›