BlueLineBae

Section C talks about how if they want to delay or deny any medication/procedure that was recommended by a physician that in needs to be by another physician. There's already a loophole in place for this section which is that insurance companies hire loads of physicians to look at case files and determine if it should be denied or not. There is obviously a huge conflict of interest there, but that's how that works.

However, section D talks about how if they delay or deny anything, the insurance company has the burden of proof and would have to pay for any damages or legal fees in doing so. That part is HUGE! Accountability in the court for this bullshit!

Source: Not a lawyer, but work for one of the largest health insurers in the US.

I mean... Schitt's Creek is fictional but it's definitely entertaining.

As a graphic designer, I'm currently on the fence. I love the AI tools that make tedious tasks significantly easier such as cutting out curly or frizzy hair. I also enjoy using generative AI as a tool to do things like replace an object in someone's hand or seamlessly fill in the background where I removed something, but unfortunately those are the things that are potentially stealing from other artists and so is morally wrong to use. It is nice to just play around with it for the sake of generating ideas that you could build off of or to try to create a mock-up before execution. It's sad really, because I would absolutely love to use the generative tools more but I just don't see how I can at this point in time. Instead I currently use it for things that are private that I wouldn't profit off of. For example, I made a puzzle for my father in law using a photo of his family's farm and used generative AI to recreate the photo in the artistic style of his favorite puzzle artist. He was delighted to have it and it became a highly unique item he could enjoy. I never intend to sell it or even share it with anyone else. It's for him only and I doubt his favorite puzzle artist will lose anything from it.

🪨

Can attest as I am part of said labyrinth. My job is mostly stable, but I truly feel it's not necessary in the grand scheme of things and I'd gladly give up my job if I knew we could all have universal health care. For reference, I'm a graphic designer deep down in the medical system and so far removed from anything useful that they continually have to remind us of our "usefulness" and say things like "it can be easy to lose sight of our greater impact". Bro I make power points that help the sales team sell services to different states and/or buy up smaller med companies. How the hell is this helping the lady over there afford breast cancer treatment?

I genuinely don't know how chipotle has survived this long when excellent family run Mexican restaurants are a dime a dozen all over the country and are super cheap to boot. I've tried it a few times and just never understood what people liked about it that you can't get at your local Mexican joint.

hunter2

The feeling is even better when they let you go because you no longer have a moral obligation to transition anything over to your coworkers. You can just fuck off and not feel bad. This typically highlights all the holes in management when they are ineffective at delegating your tasks and things get dropped. My husband witnessed this happen recently. They let an employee go nearly a year ago, then a client started sending emails wondering what was happening to their project and why there hadn't been communication.

A long time ago I was able to step outside the morning after an ice storm. It was sunny, and everything looked like glistening glass. Every tree, bench, light pole, etc. it was one of the most beautiful but eerie things I've ever seen. And yes, it's quite dangerous. The weight of the ice compromises the integrity of an awful lot of unexpected things and ice all over the sidewalks doesn't help either.

Just dial down the middle! C-A-L-L-A-T-T

Why not both?

Queer up! Worst show on television.