Faith is fragile. Any belief in something unprovable, based on no more than a feeling is on shaky ground in the first place. Some people base their entire personality on this thin ice. Anything that rattles their perception of self is dangerous for them in the most personal way. It shows them their weakness. Eroding someone's cornerstone could cause psychological meltdown of their carefully crafted delusions leaving only the questions they have learned to fear the most.
Atheism
Community Guide
Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.
Statement of Purpose
- This is a support and conversation community for people who don't believe in gods.
- Superstition hucksters have no reason to subscribe or post here at all.
- If you are looking to debate or proselytize, options will be linked lower in the sidebar.
Acceptable
- Honest questions or conversations.
- Discussions on parenting or advice.
- Struggles, frustrations, coming out.
- Atheist memes. We can have fun!
- News headlines relevant to atheism.
Unacceptable
Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.
- Anything against site rules.
- Illegal and/or NSFW material.
- Troll posts and comments. There will be no attempt to explain what that means.
- Leading questions, agenda pushing, or disingenuous attempts to bait members.
- Personal attacks or flaming.
Inadvisable
- Self promotion or upvote farming.
- Excessive shitposting or off-topic discussion.
Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.
Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.
~ /c/nostupidquestions
If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!
Connect with Atheists
- Matrix: #atheism:envs.net
Help and Support Links
- Freedom From Religion Foundation
- The Secular Therapy Project
- Secular Students Alliance
- Black Nonbelievers
- The Clergy Project
- Atheist Alliance International
- Sunday Assembly
- Atheist Ireland
- Atheism UK
- Atheists United
Streaming Media
This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.
- Atheist Debates - Matt Dillahunty
- Rationality Rules
- Friendly Atheist
- Making Sense with Sam Harris
- Cosmic Skeptic
- Genetically Modified Skeptic
- Street Epistemology
- Armored Skeptic
- NonStampCollector
Orgs, Blogs, Zines
- Center for Inquiry
- American Atheists
- Humanists International
- Atheist Republic
- The Brights
- The Angry Atheist
- History for Atheists
- Rationalist International
- Atheist Revolution
- Debunking Christianity
- Godless Mom
- Atheist Freethinkers
Mainstream
Bibliography
Start here...
...proceed here.
- God is Not Great (Hitchens)
- The God Delusion (Dawkins)
- The End of Faith (Harris)
- Why I Am Not a Christian (Russell)
- Letter to a Christian Nation (Harris)
Proselytize Religion
From Reddit
As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.
I used to feel insulted by stuff like this when I was Christian, so I get it. For many, religion provides a sense of purpose and meaning, and questioning that can feel like a direct attack. The thing is, for some, logic itself becomes a threat. It shakes the foundation of what they hold most dear, and that’s uncomfortable. This review, for example, comes from a book that explores the idea that a hypothetical god-like entity must be fundamentally twisted in order to make sense in a logical framework. It’s a challenging perspective, but one that makes us rethink how we view divinity in relation to the world around us.
The thing is, for some, logic itself becomes a threat.
THIS is exactly why religion is dangerous. When one starts to have questions about logic and rational thinking it bleeds out into the rest of their lives. This generates antagonistic behavior towards science, medicine, and education. The push back on the threat, and the support to do so within the community is so subtle in the beginning that it doesn't seem absurd from those in religion.
I've been out of the church since I turned 18 and bolted out the door on my own, but here's a very simplified explanation from my own experiences.
Do you think that’s because people fear reinterpretation, or is it just resistance to any challenge of belief?
Yes, to both.
Anything that makes a religious zealot think is pretty much automatically considered satanic, evil, of the devil, etc. Anything that challenges their sect's interpretation / dogma is also the devil's work / temptation.
Anything that isn't strictly in line with the sect's teachings is "of the world" and to be avoided. The only things they approve of are things that reinforce their existing interpretations. Basically, an echo chamber.
I wish I was joking or exaggerating, but at least in the religious environment I grew up in, that's how it was.
Here's the joke / not-a-joke answer: Jesus was a long haired white guy. That is not a picture of a long-haired white guy.
It’s fascinating how anything that disrupts the echo chamber is labeled as dangerous. It makes you wonder—if a belief system is truly unshakable, why fear questioning it? The idea that truth can’t withstand scrutiny seems contradictory. Maybe that’s why reinterpretation is so threatening—it forces people to confront the possibility that their 'absolute truths' might not be so absolute after all.
You have to remember that the scripture is dictated from the top: the Pope to the bishops to the priests to the masses, or the equivalent in other sects/religions. Therefore it's not so much about belief as it is about control: "trust my words only, disregard anything someone else says to contradict it." And it's repeated over and over with every sermon. Heck, the whole start of the Abrahamic religion is someone being told "kill your son, trust me bro it's the right thing to do."
That's an interesting point, and it's true that religious institutions have often been about maintaining control, shaping belief to fit a centralized narrative. The way scripture is interpreted and enforced can definitely create a system where questioning or alternative viewpoints are discouraged. It's almost like a constant reinforcement of trust in the authority—be it the Pope, clergy, or anyone in a position of power within the religious structure.
The story of Abraham is a stark example of this kind of unquestioning obedience, and it’s unsettling to think about how such acts are framed as divine tests. It raises a lot of questions about the nature of faith, morality, and the ways we accept or challenge authority in our lives. Sometimes, it's not about belief itself, but about how and why we’re made to believe.
Just go read the 1 star reviews of the game Cult of the Lamb on Google. More than half of them are pearl clutching christians being completely shocked by the thematic. They see it as part of an agenda to promote satanism to kids instead of just being a game with a silly premise.
It's interesting how deeply ingrained some beliefs are, to the point where even something as harmless as a game can spark accusations of promoting satanism. The real issue, though, isn't just the perception of a game but the way religious teachings often shape children’s worldviews from such a young age. Take things like forcing kids to wear hijabs or pushing them into child marriages—they’re not just about faith; they’re about control and limiting autonomy.
Even the constant bombardment of fairy tale-like stories in religious settings can harm a child's development. It stifles critical thinking and encourages the acceptance of the fantastical over rational, evidence-based understanding. The fact that something as benign as a game can be viewed as a threat shows how deep the fear of challenging these narratives goes. It's a reminder that the real damage is often done when kids are taught to accept things without question, simply because it’s "part of the tradition."
It doesn't take much time on any forum to see that people really like to be right, and they like to make sure that everybody knows they are right.
When you've built your life around a concept that you think is good and somebody else tries to tell you it's bad, you tend to get a little defensive.
Whether it's religion, politics, media, or which way to put toilet paper on the roll, some people are more flexible, but nobody is immune from this.
Exactly! It’s human nature to defend what we believe, especially when it’s something foundational to our identity. But I think the challenge is in being open to the possibility that being 'right' isn't the end-all-be-all. Flexibility allows for growth, but it requires the courage to step outside of our comfort zones and be willing to entertain new perspectives, even when it’s uncomfortable.
why do people react so strongly when a book dares to reinterpret sacred ideas?
For a lot of people, their religion is part of them, so to make fun of it is to make fun of them.
For others, mainly the leaders, it's an affront to their power. "How dare someone make fun of the tools I use to control people"?
Exactly, and it goes deeper than just the personal or the power dynamic. For many, sacred ideas represent the foundation of their worldview—challenging them can feel like challenging the very core of their existence. It’s a hard thing to digest when your belief system is questioned, especially if it's intertwined with your identity. But it’s also interesting how these reinterpretations can push people to think more critically about what they believe and why. It’s uncomfortable, yes, but growth often comes from discomfort.
Very true, but I suspect most people would rather double down on their beliefs, much like this comic:
I suppose this is the more common outcome as they will have a considerable pool of friends/family/colleagues that can reinforce their faith and are likely to also feel personally offended
One scene in the book hit me particularly hard: a character with three eyes, one weeping while the other two smile as he knots a corpse like a bag. It’s gruesome, sure, but the hidden symbolism makes it even darker—it reflects the Christian Trinity, with Jesus suffering while the Father and Holy Spirit remain distant. It’s a powerful and eerie take on an old concept.
That seems like a fairly wide metaphorical leap. Are you sure that's the intended interpretation? Because it just sounds like body horror to me. The third eye has a lot of symbolism in several religions, and comparing a corpse to a disposable vessel isn't particularly Christian, either.
Either way, yeah, faith is powerful and fragile. It's a function of humanity, an intellectual crutch that gives people the strength to stand on an idea that isn't supported by reality. It is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of the unseen. People who embrace faith for what it is will see it carry them through whatever criticism they face. People who use faith to construct delusions, whether knowingly to benefit themselves or unknowingly because it is all they have ever learned, will meet criticism with anger and resentment.
I can see how the scene might come off as body horror, but as the story progresses, the layers of symbolism become clearer. The three eyes and the way the character interacts with the corpse are definitely unsettling, but they take on a deeper meaning as the events unfold. Without giving too much away, the connection to the Christian Trinity becomes a central theme that challenges the viewer’s understanding of suffering, presence, and absence. The Father and Holy Spirit’s seeming detachment plays into a broader commentary that unpacks the way suffering and divine roles are perceived.
As for the concept of faith, I agree with you—faith can be a powerful anchor or a delusion, depending on how it’s wielded. The more we dig into these ideas, the more we realize how much people shape their beliefs to align with what they feel is most comforting, even if it’s not supported by tangible reality.
You have to remember that the scripture is dictated from the top: the Pope to the bishops to the priests to the masses, or the equivalent in other sects/religions. Therefore it’s not so much about belief as it is about control: “trust my words only, disregard anything someone else says to contradict it.” And it’s repeated over and over with every sermon. Heck, the whole start of the Abrahamic religion is someone being told “kill your son, trust me bro it’s the right thing to do.
I can see how the scene might come off as body horror, but as the story progresses, the layers of symbolism become clearer. The three eyes and the way the character interacts with the corpse are definitely unsettling, but they take on a deeper meaning as the events unfold. Without giving too much away, the connection to the Christian Trinity becomes a central theme that challenges the viewer's understanding of suffering, presence, and absence. The Father and Holy Spirit’s seeming detachment plays into a broader commentary that unpacks the way suffering and divine roles are perceived.
As for the concept of faith, I agree with you—faith can be a powerful anchor or a delusion, depending on how it’s wielded. The more we dig into these ideas, the more we realize how much people shape their beliefs to align with what they feel is most comforting, even if it’s not supported by tangible reality.
Replace the christian stuff with gender stuff and see a similar reaction from some other people. Plenty of sacred cows out there to offend. Sacred cows are the most normal thing in the world.