this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
28 points (83.3% liked)

Atheism

4580 readers
65 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently came across a brutal review from a devoted Christian on goodreads of a novel called Insane Entities, he called it blasphemous and asked for it to be removed. The novel takes religious concepts and twists them into something… unsettling. It got me thinking—why do people react so strongly when a book dares to reinterpret sacred ideas?

One scene in the book hit me particularly hard: a character with three eyes, one weeping while the other two smile as he knots a corpse like a bag. It’s gruesome, sure, but the hidden symbolism makes it even darker—it reflects the Christian Trinity, with Jesus suffering while the Father and Holy Spirit remain distant. It’s a powerful and eerie take on an old concept.

It seems like books that tackle religious themes in unconventional ways always get the harshest criticism. Do you think that’s because people fear reinterpretation, or is it just resistance to any challenge of belief?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

It's interesting how deeply ingrained some beliefs are, to the point where even something as harmless as a game can spark accusations of promoting satanism. The real issue, though, isn't just the perception of a game but the way religious teachings often shape children’s worldviews from such a young age. Take things like forcing kids to wear hijabs or pushing them into child marriages—they’re not just about faith; they’re about control and limiting autonomy.

Even the constant bombardment of fairy tale-like stories in religious settings can harm a child's development. It stifles critical thinking and encourages the acceptance of the fantastical over rational, evidence-based understanding. The fact that something as benign as a game can be viewed as a threat shows how deep the fear of challenging these narratives goes. It's a reminder that the real damage is often done when kids are taught to accept things without question, simply because it’s "part of the tradition."