this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
513 points (98.3% liked)

politics

31297 readers
1578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kobra@lemm.ee 95 points 2 years ago

Highest level of fuckup imaginable so far…

[–] HexPat@lemm.ee 85 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Except it’s not. It’s on purpose to avoid required record keeping and FOIA requests. Illegal as hell but here we are.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 51 points 2 years ago

The fuck up they're referring to is the fact that they accidentally exposed themselves using Signal in the first place.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

FOIA has nothing to do with this.

These are discussions of military operations and our relation to foreign nations. It would basically instantly be considered sensitive for quite some time. Think "years" and it would be pretty trivial to get that bumped up to decades.

This was solely about the convenience of not needing to use a VTC room or the fancy computer in their office (that they probably leave the door unlocked to but...) and possibly being able to show it to russia.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

The ringleader, and President of the United States of America, is a convicted Rapist. They don't give a fuck what you think about them, because you've proven that you'll elect them anyways.

Why would they care? Republicans went on tirades for like... 3 years about "Epstein lists!" even though we knew beyond all doubt that Trump was on those lists, but they somehow don't think he's a pedophile. We know Trump raped "Katie Johnson," a 13 year old girl with Epstein. From his base? Crickets.

They just plain don't fucking care. They're evil people masquerading as non-evil people.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh come on, they're going to have higher levels of fuckup than simply this. Get a better imagination.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

Yep and there will be zero consequences for these clowns

[–] iterable@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also isn't it in violation of the freedom of information act?

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

The what now?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Fuckup" is an understatement... Inviting the journalist was a fuckup. Intentionally discussing classified information over an external app like Signal is "very fucking illegal".

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

While in Moscow.

Moscow is not a SCIF.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Say incompetence. INCOMPETENCE!

They are scared you'll see their incompetence. They don't care if you see their f**k ups. They don't care if you see their crimes. They don't care if you see their evil.

But they really don't want you to think they're incompetent. Which of course, they are.

Every time they fire somebody and they have to rehire them. INCOMPETENCE

Every time they say they're going to do something and it doesn't get done. INCOMPETENCE.

Oh, believe me, their egos are so fragile, they will pitch a fit.

[–] mudmaniac@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

In my heart I feel that there are yet higher levels of fuckup still to be scaled.

Basically, highest level of fsck imaginable SO FAR.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Imagine what the folks in Langley are thinking. The fucking Kremlin is proud of their orange fuck up.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Criticism from Democrats is not going to have any effect.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

DEMOCRATS used HARSH REBUKE

It's not very effective...

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They already decided what they're gonna do about being caught using signal exclusively for communications:

Nothing.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh they'll do something: They'll try harder not to get caught.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The only way to respond is to blitzkrieg the media cycle and get them talking about something else outrageous.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How to use Signal competently: ALCON - Report to a SCIF

How not to use Signal: I AM THE SCIF NOW

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Couldn't find a SCIF in Moscow.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Don't worry, before the end of the year we'll get into the

U N I M A G I N A B L E Z O N E

of fuck ups.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Pete is right. Completely embarrassing.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Except… and aside from the legal FOIA issues… I’d rather have them use Signal. It could’ve been Line, Telegram, WhatsApp or any other compromised messenger.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The military and government have an entire separate Internet for exactly these kinds of discussions. The fact that they resorted to a private app at all is illegal.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure I get that. Again I’m not defending them. I’m just commending them for their choice of messenger. Illegal or not.

And besides, I believe in FOSS not in closed source, so-called secret developments. When it comes to cryptography and security, open source is the best way to go.

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

JD Vance's whole phone was already hacked by the Chinese state. He's part of this chat thread.

(Salt Typhoon... They hacked the entire phone system and infiltrated Trump and Vance's phones.)

Whether it was "signal" or not is missing the bigger context, this fucker is a total buffoon of incompetence because this is time #2 within a short span of time. He literally is stupid.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Popping the telecom infra doesn't automatically grant access to Signal messages.

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No it doesnt.

But there was a simultaneous hack from a person in the US military that proved they had weak passwords and didn't have 2 factor security on their devices.

Same time that happens, the Chinese were identifying these same devices and those of many others in government. And the official account is "nobody knows how much access they had with their hack.". This is clearly a very serious hack.

If that wasn't bad enough, they learned nothing, apparently.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

hesgeth a military fuckup himself. he also was pissed he wasnt allowed near biden early in his first term.

load more comments
view more: next ›