this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
654 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

14048 readers
2556 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago

>Puts Iron-56 in a box.
>checks at the heat death if the universe
>still Iron-56
>mfw box also Iron-56

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But if you don’t look in side 2 billion years later, it’s both U-235 and lead-207!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Schrödinger’s radioactive decay may or may not have killed his cat.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The lump would still have about 14% uranium still in it. (If my understanding of half-life is correct)

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Afaik its always going to have some parts of uranium right? 50% after one half life, 25% after two half lives and it will keep on halving practically forever (or till the last atom decays). In the end it comes down to when you consider it a negligible amount.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

after a certain point, you're going to get to where you have to split an atom or two.

fairly sure that'd be far less exciting than normal.

Edit: i decided to try and figure out how long that would take.. and per usual the law of large numbers caused my eyes to glaze over.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

half life times log2(amount of atoms), right?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean I didn’t get that far, I lost track of how many zeroes were in the half-life.

(It’s 704ish million, right?)

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, yes, that's how it would work if there were an infinite number of atoms in the piece. There's a finite amount, though, so eventually there will be a point when all the atoms have completely decayed.

All models are wrong, but some are useful.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, thats what I was using to get 14%.

2billion years is about 2.8 halflives, so I calculated (1/2)^2.8 ~ 0.14.

[–] kehet@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 weeks ago

Damn greedy corporations and their shrinkflation

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn bro, how many times has this happened to you

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Enough to post the meme

[–] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you put a cat into the box with the uranium and wait the same amount of time, that cat will be dead. this is true. no questions. thank you.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Unless the uranium in the box caused a mutation in the cat giving it eternal life.

[–] geomela@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So is Lead-207 special lead, or is it just, like, lead?

[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The normal lead we know but still special. Is the last stable element in the PSE and there is the theory that it's actually radioactive (unstable) but the decay is so slow that we probably never see a single atom of it decaying.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Schrödinger’s Nucleides.