this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
137 points (95.4% liked)

News

36043 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 114 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like much less than an AOC.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

AOC and Bernie are the gold standards. Be great if the bootlickers became un-nominatable and unelectable. Would definitey settle for at most NOMINALized

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 12 points 11 months ago

I hate grade inflation so I consider a C a respectable grade. D-

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A O Riverrrrrr!

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Michael: GOB, get rid of the Seaward

Lucille: I'll leave when I'm good and ready

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 76 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sure, go ahead and demean one of the most popular and beloved politicians in office. That‘ll totally make people listen to you. AOC is the single best communicator the Democrats have on their bench. Other Democrats need to be learning from her and making more space for her style of leadership, not talking shit about her. That’s yet another thing they failed to learn from the 2024 election.

I think it’s pretty telling that to much of the progressive and leftist base, Slotkin comes across as a Republican from the 1990’s (with all her Reagan-worship crap) and is generally not a particularly popular politician outside of neoliberal DC power circles. While on the other hand, AOC is incredibly popular across the nation, and is widely liked and respected not only because she comes across as a real genuine human being, but because her ideas and political approach appeal to almost everyone, including many Republicans. I heard some interviews with Trump voters where they were asked how they felt about AOC, and a surprising number of them said they agreed with a lot, but not all of her opinions, but they consistently said they respected her because they believed she meant what she said and that she seemed to genuinely care about the right groups of people.

From the end of the article:

Ocasio-Cortez “best reflects the core values” of the Democratic Party, a CNN poll of voters recently found.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ocasio-Cortez “best reflects the core values” of the Democratic Party, a CNN poll of voters recently found.

-- but not the core values of the democratic leadership, as evidenced by pelosi cockblocking aoc from the oversight committee; sanders cockblocked from the nomination in the last 2 presidential elections; and the palestinians blocked from speaking at the convention in the last election; among other examples.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

100%

That’s why it’s so dangerous for Democratic leadership to keep ignoring and actively pushing against AOC’s popularity. The ideological distance between Democratic leadership and the voters that put them in power is vast. That’s a serious problem that they don’t seem to be reckoning with.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

That’s a serious problem that they don’t seem to be reckoning with.

and nor will they ever have to since they're the only perceived alternative to the republicans and the surest sign of it is schumer getting re-lected next time around despite his support for the latest cr.

I do suspect it’s getting to the point where AOC and Sanders will either do their level best to somehow conduct a coup in DNC leadership… or, just say “fuck it” and actually make a real new party that actually does what Democrats have been saying they would do in campaign promises for decades. And, you know, give no quarter to fascists.

[–] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Liberals will always walk lockstep with fascists to prevent progressives from ever having a voice. Happened in Germany, happened in Turkey, most recently happened in France.

Neo-liberals are the evil they claim to fight. Just with rainbow pins.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago

“I get it that it makes people feel good to see people yelling,” Slotkin told the audience. “But not one of those words is stopping the actual things that Donald Trump is doing, and I am about action, not words, and I will stand by that as long as I live.”

Please, Senator, tell us about your actions that are stopping Donald Trump from doing what he's doing. No need to be coy. Its what you "stand by as long as you live". This should be an easy answer for you.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Constituent Kristin Fellows, 62, asked the Democrats how they are pushing back against Musk and President Donald Trump.

“We know that you are against these current awful happenings going on in the world, but it is simply not enough for you to repeatedly tell us that you are,” Fellows said, according to the Associated Press, and the question was met with a round of applause from the audience.

“My job is to be more than just an activist. It is to answer the call when there’s an immigration raid and we need to figure out where our people are,” Slotkin said. “All of those things require me to be more than just an AOC.”

Slotkin ought to know where "our people" are since she voted for legislation requiring any immigrant who's baselessly charged with petty nonsense like shoplifting to be detained (archived).

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 67 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

These "moderate" Dems sound like they belong on Fox News. She just couldn't resist taking a shot at a progressive to try to score political points with the fascists.

The thing is, they just see her as a pandering weakling who's too much of a coward to pick a side. And they're right.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

They work so hard to be uninspiring. Right now it would take so little. Just, anything. But instead they chide us for expecting anything...

Edit: worst typo ever

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fuck these people.

I used to be a Moderate. But then the Right blew up the Overton Window and went full Fascist.

I didn’t move along with them. I stayed fucking put. But now, relative to them, I am a Radical.

And I’m ok with that.

We shouldn’t be forced to move right.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

How incredibly inhumane. Immigrants built this country. If anyone here isn't the descendant of an immigrant; they are an either an descendant of a native American to survived the genocide, or of a chattel slave who survived the anti-black violence that's been prevalent in this country for over a hundred years.

If the ideal version of America is supposed to be freedom and democracy where anyone looking to make a better life for themselves is welcome, then anti-immigrant sentiment is anti-american.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you mean descendant.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yes! That's the right word. Fixed, thanks

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I'm sure she still has friends at the CIA who can find them for her.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 11 months ago (3 children)

“I get it that it makes people feel good to see people yelling,” Slotkin told the audience. “But not one of those words is stopping the actual things that Donald Trump is doing, and I am about action, not words, and I will stand by that as long as I live.”

Ok, so let's have them. What specific actions are you taking against this madness? We'll wait.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Any minute now

[–] WorkersCorps@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Democrats horribly misunderstand the political situation we're in where 'action, not words' leaves a communcation vaccuum for MAGA and their GOP supplicants to fill with lies.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

AOC/Sanders aren't even that leftwing.

It's just an optical illusion looking at them from inside the burgeoning fourth Reich of Stupid Hitler's crazy town.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

"The senator noted that she also serves Trump voters of Michigan"

There it is. As somebody who has an (R)President, (R)governor, (R)Senator, (R)Congressperson I can tell you that not a single one feels the need to represent my point of view or interests. This statement by Slotkin strikes me as nothing more than idealism that serves to only inhibit the party's ability to pass meaningful legislation.

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For real, I live in a gop district. Those clowns don't give a single shit about my opinion. People like Slotkin enable Republicans by constantly validating their views, and at this point it feels very much planned and deliberate.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It'll take until 2034. Don't use her up early.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fuck man AOC 2025 if we could swing it

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm just a lot more pessimistic about how bad things get between now and 8 years from now.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You ain't wrong brother

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Grow some ovaries

[–] Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Slotkin might as well be another Sinema.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I think Fetterman claimed that seat first.