this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
451 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

12488 readers
222 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 99 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I've been seeing it pop up more in embedded/PC based devices. Seems to be replacing Windows XP and the other embedded Windows versions. Guess Microsoft wants too much for those licenses.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was really surprised seeing KDE on the kiosk at our local unemployment office which is notorious for bad IT. That was 7 or 8 years ago.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Even bad IT people can still run Linux, though.

Signed,
A bad IT guy.

Edit: I run Arch BTW

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

kwik trip's self-serve 'fresh blends' smoothie machines use it. see one crashed every now and then here.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

I used to run 8.1 embedded as my desktop and honestly if my exoerience with it was anything to go by windows embedded has been only requiring more resources while losing features that make having a separate embedded edition make sense.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 65 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 36 points 11 months ago

"Please just put the fries in the bag. I don't care about open source or that GNU is the operating system and Linux is the kernel or whatever you're yappin about!"

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Beats the hell out of paying Microsoft so you can keep running your business.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Instead they're probably paying Canonical

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 4 points 11 months ago

That or competent in house staff, but either are better options.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 27 points 11 months ago

TIL one Wendy's uses Ubuntu

Seems a bit heavy to use full Ubuntu for a single application appliance, but I guess it’s still probably better than Windows.

[–] KbSez@piefed.social 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

smart. 1000% less problems than windows and 5000% more secure

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

-900% problems..... Not sure you thought that through.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I got -900% problems but a snap ain't one

I don't know man

[–] Chodi_MacCunt@thelemmy.club 1 points 11 months ago

u got anofg erhghs

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Linux is so robust it can absorb ≤ 9 problems created elsewhere.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if Wendy's donates back to the project. Ive seen so many companies use Foss software and not pay anything and it pisses me off every time.

[–] amon@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tbf it's just a kiosk so I doubt there's anything special other than a kiosk software and Ubuntu core image

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah but they should still pay Ubuntu for using their os to make profit off.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for sharing, always nice to see!

But nowadays I'd be surprised if one of these display devices ran Windows or some similar crap that is NOT Linux.

Ubuntu/Canonical did, imho, the right thing to offer paid support for what is otherwise a free OS. That's what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department. Of course Redhat et. al. also offer that but Ubuntu seems more suitable for smaller solutions?

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

That’s what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department.

I doubt those companies can afford paid support from the likes of Cannonical and Red Hat - their licenses are solely for other at-scale companies to write off expenses and shift blame if something hits the fan.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gross. Dont buy from evil corporations

[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Yikes, thanks. Now I've got the beef... With Wendy's

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 11 months ago

It's a socialism for me not thee business model.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I had a frosty once

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

So does Panda E

[–] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Wow! I can't believe a company would use an OS.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ubuntu for a kiosk is really dumb though. I guess it's still better than windows.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

i mean linux is linux if its only booting up to display video or a simple interaction panel

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago

They ship a kiosk specific build if I remember correctly