this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
373 points (99.0% liked)

Comic Strips

23708 readers
2108 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Am I missing something, or are the images for "Traditionalist" and "Modern" swapped?

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did they fix it? I currently see Pluto highlighted in Traditionalist and not in Modern.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

I believe in the freedom of information, and to that end, enjoy this rare XKCD misprint

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Yup, they did. Cool.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you’re right.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No the comic is correct. Pluto is not considered a planet anymore.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pluto is highlighted on Modern and is not highlighted on Traditionalist.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Ah i see. Thank you. I had to zoom in to see that.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All those who wander are planets.

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

only pluto is a planet, I am spiteful

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Love it, especially the alt text.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only a planet if we could walk on it. What would the name for that one be?

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago
[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I cannot respect people who call Pluto a planet on internet forums whenever this topic comes up. Not because I agree with NASA, think their definition is perfect, or think those people just cling to nostalgia and hate change, no.

I cannot respect them because Pluto does not care and trying to white knight perceived attacks against it will not impress it, those people are just being pathetic.

[–] SnowmenMelt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You are wrong. Pluto is hot shit and knows it.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since they are both dogs, even though Goofy is anthropomorphic, Pluto and Goofy could technically procreate.

Do with this knowledge as you seem fit...

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I'm jaded and cynical enough to not be moved by anything anymore and I have already heard that information, I'm somehow still disgusted that you invoked rule 34 here of all places.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I aim to please o7

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wrong. Pluto is actually one of the coldest bodies in the solar system at an average of -232c

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not white knighting a planet. I'm literally from where it was discovered. I went on field trips to Lowell Observatory as a kid. Fuck all y'all who won't accept my planet.

All dwarf planets are planets. Don't discriminate.

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

That's messed up.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Since categorizing something as a planet means nothing then traditionalist is the only way to go. If Mercury is in the same category as Jupiter and a sudden orbit change can mean a thing might no longer be called a planet then there is no scientific value in calling things planets. They are just traditional names given to fairly random objects like constellations.

I would personally categorize everything with a high enough gravity as a planet, i.e. everything that can hold an atmosphere or sth.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So, expansive then.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m partial to the simplistic view: big enough to be round, not big enough to fuse hydrogen

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Since people have fused hydrogen on earth, I choose to believe it's not a real planet

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically tiny amounts of Hydrogen fusion will happen in the gas giants.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I’m sure there’s a sensible line to be drawn somewhere

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Empiricist is a very solid take tbf

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Simplistic was basically the original proposal for a planet before it was highjacked on the last day of the convention by a bunch of scientists with an axe to grind.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Who put all this color in my XKCD?

I'm partial to Tom Cardy's view: Pluto isn't a planet, but that doesn't matter because it's still hot shit.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm a Universalist. It is all the same thing at different phases of matter at various temperatures and pressures combined with the gravity to hold onto various materials. Keep stacking Earths over and over and you will eventually get a gas giant then a star then a black hole.

What I will never support is the stupidity of defining any object by external criteria. If a gravitationally bound world is acted upon in a way that shifts its orbit, the object cannot be redefined. This is a definition of a state, not an object. Planet, as defined by the IAU is not a noun. Such is what I expect when a highschool teacher wrote a definition instead of actual planetary scientists. I suppose such draconian nonsense was intended to show the backwardness and medieval state of the science of astronomy.

[–] adb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can hide behind fancy words but clearly this is just being simplistic

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] adb@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sorry if you didn’t get my lame joke over the fact that the universalist and simplistic definitions of planets give the same result in the comic

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry I missed it. This issue is a pet peeve. We're in the golden age of discovery of new worlds and true extent of the Sol system, but are totally neglecting the significance of this one time in history.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What I will never support is the stupidity of defining any object by external criteria.

https://lemmy.world/comment/15686674.

https://lemmy.world/comment/15687018

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No valid arguments there either. Your car does not become a bicycle because it is in the bike lane. No object is ever defined by external factors. Only states can be defined by external factors. This is fundamental elementary language 101. The definition of an object is not related to a definition of state. There is absolutely no excuse for this blunder. Any obfuscation is nonsense. The conceptual foundation is fundamentally flawed.

There were no planetary scientists consulted whatsoever in this definition. There is no scientific basis. The paper in question is coauthored and the idea of a Highschool teacher in Temecula California. It has no grounding as a scientific concept. It is draconian in logic and completely baseless in science. It is reflective of dogma in the scientific community when it is defended.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No valid arguments there either.

Just to be clear, I agree with you, and those links are me doing so. Don't quote have the hang of cross posting here on Lemmy.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

I've been in the Expansive camp for a while.

...the highlighted bodies under Lunar are wrong. Charon isn't a moon it's a dwarf planet in its own right. The barycenter of it's orbit isn't inside Pluto. Pluto and Charon are binary dwarf planets not a planet moon pair.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They forgot about bofa . They are the only planets

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What is "surface"?

Also, what is "landed"? And why is Jupiter out? (Edit: Or the Sun, for that matter.)

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

What planet has Jupiter landed on?

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is "surface"?

In this context, I believe this is limiting to planets whose water is not deep inside the planet's crust somewhere, but exposed to its atmosphere.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, but the gas giants should have that. We just can't see them.

Unless you want pure water. But then, how pure?