this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38518 readers
187 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has gotten its first taste of remedies that Donald Trump’s Department of Justice plans to pursue to break up the tech giant’s monopoly in search. In the first filing since Trump allies took over the department, government lawyers backed off a key proposal submitted by the Biden DOJ. The government won't ask the court to force Google to sell off its AI investments, and the way it intends to handle Android is changing. However, the most serious penalty is intact—Google's popular Chrome browser is still on the chopping block.

"Google’s illegal conduct has created an economic goliath, one that wreaks havoc over the marketplace to ensure that—no matter what occurs—Google always wins," the DOJ filing says. To that end, the government maintains that Chrome must go if the playing field is to be made level again.

The DOJ is asking the court to force Google to promptly and fully divest itself of Chrome, along with any data or other assets required for its continued operation. It is essentially aiming to take the Chrome user base—consisting of some 3.4 billion people—away from Google and hand it to a competitor. The government will vet any potential buyers to ensure the sale does not pose a national security threat. During the term of the judgment, Google would not be allowed to release any new browsers. However, it may continue to contribute to the open source Chromium project.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will to bet that Musk ends up owning it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

I hate how likely this is. I can't imagine any scenario where the Trump DOJ does something like this unselfishly, and Google has already kowtowed to the Trump admin. There must be a specific Trump ally they have in mind that would buy that from Google, Musk is just the most likely.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. It could be sold to someone who is a worse steward of web standards than Google

  2. It could lead to Google exerting far more influence/control on Firefox while still funding Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are Lineage and Graphene still decent android alternatives?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're both android, but without the Google services tacked on. The question is, how will the Android Open Source project fare if Google is forced to divest from it? And where does that leave the ungoogled ROMs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you explain to me, an Idiot™, what that would mean for me in practice if I switched? Would I be able to use the play store? What about my bank's app, or something that uses location, like Grindr?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Would I be able to use the play store?

Yep! Most Android roms allow you to install a Google apps pack ("GApps") on top of the system, so they're installed as system apps like normal. There's different packs, from the bare essentials (play store and play services) to basically everything made by google.

GrapheneOS is cool because it has a sandboxing layer, so you can install those same Google apps as normal user apps and avoid giving them the extra permissions they get as system apps.

What about my bank's app, or something that uses location, like Grindr?

This depends. Google's Play Integrity API is used by a bunch of apps to easily enforce "security" and disallow using the app if the integrity check fails. Thing is, the things it checks for aren't necessarily what's secure, but more like what does Google approve of. For example, I would consider GrapheneOS at least as secure as official Google Android, but it can fail the Integrity API checks.

My bank apps work fine, but that doesn't mean yours will. And I don't use dating apps, so no clue there. Really, you'ld just have to try it and see how well it works. Just be sure you have good backups if you do, and also know how to restore the original system if using an alternate doesn't work out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes (with the caveat that it's still tied to Google) and yes (de-googled)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will be interesting to see if this continues, or if Trump is just trying to extract something from Google to drop the case.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

They will edit Google Maps to show Canada and Greenland as part of the US, and Ukraine as part of Russia.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hate both Trump and Google. Best case scenario, Google gives the Trump administration the middle finger and open sources Chrome. Worst case scenario, one of trump’s cronies ends up in control of Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Chrome is (basically) already open source. That's why there are a million crappy browsers out there, they are Chromium clones. Google could give Chrome to the Chromium project and cut ties with Chromium, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Worst case scenario, one of tr***’s cronies ends up in control of Chrome.

That's absolutely going to be the plan for anything Google is forced to sell.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

This issue here is who buys it if this comes to pass. There are likely even worse owners, which may be why the junta is still going for this.