this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
313 points (91.5% liked)

Canada

9464 readers
1635 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The benefit of a tarrif on Tesla vs opening the market to China is that we can easily undo it if there is a US coup, Trump gets medicated, gets burned, whatever. There's still the potential that this is a temporary situation, not the new reality. If we open up to a third party, we can't put the genie back in the bottle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Chinese EVs are already being sold worldwide. We can either choose to "stand with" western auto manufacturers, or let free market do its thing. In this scenario it only makes sense to play both sides and offer people some economic relief.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Canada has the same incentive to not open the door to Chinese EVs that the US does.

Why would they shoot themselves in the face just to splash some blood on someone else?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Canada doesn't have the incentives that the Americans have at all. Correct me if I'm wrong. America's incentive is to protect its own EV industry, Canada doesn't have an EV industry of its own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The incentive for the US is the US government can spy on its citizens. China could care less if you drove to planned parenthood last week...The Republicans on the other hand want to burn people at the stake for it.

Elon gets the added bonus of whacking off to people doing unsavory things in his cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Why not do both? I like public transit idea but does not work for smaller/rural communities

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

If they care about the environment at all they will. If they care about their people at all, they already would have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I think we should build them ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing. I always thought one of the main reasons for the 100% tariffs was to be in line with what the US wanted. But with things being the way they are, I think we should open the door for Chinese EVs. If it benefits Canada, we should do it. I'm not well versed on the Chinese EVs, but from some of the documentaries I've seen, the quality is comparable to the US models, if not better, due to the features that they pack into their base models. I know that there are concerns about eavesdropping and data collection, but isn't that a risk with the US too? And especially the way the US is now, I'd trust them even less. Because it goes beyond the data collection, it goes to their intention of annexation.

I'd rather we open the door to Chinese EVs, or any other competitors, just so our trade is more diversified. (I'm not familiar with the infrastructure investments that would be required for Chinese EVs, or policy adjustments, I just think it's something that should be seriously explored and implemented, just so we're not so dependent on the US alone).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you remotely care about privacy, don't go near a Tesla. The stories about internal sharing of private customer videos is horrific. It's the ultimate in domestic surveillance tech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why not both?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›