this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
168 points (97.7% liked)

UK Politics

3600 readers
154 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The shitshow in the Whitehouse yesterday really brought it to light - the U.S. can no longer be trusted with our secrets. Its time to leave 5 eyes. I would create a new intelligence sharing union with the other 3 members, on condition that they also leave. Inviting France and other EU states might also make sense.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see your 5 eyes and raise you confiscation of all UK Trump/Musk assets to pay for the Ukraine war, as they are now both obviously Russian Oligarchs.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No no no. Musk - yes, no need to fool around there. But trump's assets need to be seized under the "Making everything super bigly again" act of 2025 wherein assets are moved under the control of the government to increase their value and pay out 100x their assessed worth instantly.

Just, ah, just sign here, sir.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Careful. Last time Australia threatened to deny America access to our intelligence apparatus they did a coup and took down our government

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Fortunately/unfortunately for us the CIA is in the middle of their own coup and probably doesn’t have time for meddling right now

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you. I had no clue about this meddling. It's worth noting that M16 was involved as well, and the coup was conducted using archaic British monarchy laws.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are circumstantial reasons to suspect MI6 (N.B.: Military Intelligence. Not the number 16.), and the Queen's involvement certainly makes it possible. But there isn't actually strong evidence that they were involved, and there's a much less clear motive for it. (Some general motive in terms of Australia moving to the left, but not the specific motive of the threat to shut down a CIA-run facility in Pine Gap.)

By contrast, we now know that the Governor General (the Queen's official representative in Australia) at the time was referred to as "our man" by the CIA and he involved with organisations that we now know were CIA funded. The CIA also had their "coupmaster" (nicknamed for his known involvement in other coups) appointed as Ambassador to Australia.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the extra info. Seems highly likely. Also yeah I know it's MI6, I swear I typed that. I'm gonna blame autocorrect 😤

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe we could group together with other countries in the same continent as us and grow stronger bonds with them. You could even make it easier for trade to go between such countries by sharing some common laws amongst one another. Another wild idea is that if some countries are struggling to get people to work on certain industries, we could make it easier for people within this group to work between different countries.

Could call it the Group of Europe or something similar.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

American here - please leave, for everyone’s sake. America as we have all known her is dead.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 19 points 1 month ago

Australian here, yes please, if we can cancel AUKUS at the same time save us all a bunch of money that'd be cool too

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why not kick the US out of 5 eyes.

[–] zeet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Because the intelligence sharing network would instantly gain the nickname 'Speccy'.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

I would think it mostly uses their infrastructure.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right but it would be enormously complex. We'd actually have to set up a new, separate system, first, then leave, and do that without upsetting a notoriously thin-skinned sociopath, who would still, during the process, have all our secrets.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I disagree - everything we send goes to Moscow. Everything we get comes from Moscow. There is no value for us. There's nothing to lose by leaving.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm afraid there is, because Trump's vindictiveness won't stop with intelligence! Tariffs would be just the start.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then he's already an aggressor. It s time to stand up bullies and fascists.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

Yes. Again, I did start my comment with 'You're right'. But it's also the case that what you - and I - are advocating for would, in the short term, be a boon to terrorism and organised crime, and may well have knock on effects for the economy, too.

My point is not that we shouldn't do it, but that it would have massive, unpredictable consequences!

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, this is like the country level of justifying staying with an abuser. If the USA is unreliable and insecure, because of trumps, but more because the American people voted him in and their government sees fit not to prevent the kind of issues he's causing. Then it's better to leave and face consequences, and retaliate appropriately now, than suffer and still face those same consequences later.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it isn't, because the first thing I said was:

You’re right

And the rest of my comment simply pointed out that it would be complex and risky - which is true.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, but you’re discounting the fact that all intelligence is shared in the mean time. All large intergovernmental organisations are complex. The USA is likely compromised. Sharing data with them would undermine the new entity.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Probably why they wanted that Apple backdoor?