this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025

126 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31359 readers

2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

outrageousmatter@lemmy.world

aidan@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world

JuBe@lemmy.world

Lasherz12@lemmy.world

126

Democrats in Congress see potential shutdown as leverage to counter Trump (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

With a government shutdown looming, Democrats are debating whether to use it as leverage against Trump’s sweeping federal cuts.

Some argue withholding support for a funding bill could challenge Trump’s radical restructuring, including mass firings and agency shutdowns.

The GOP-controlled Congress must secure Democratic votes to pass a funding bill, but hard-right demands complicate negotiations.

Concerns grow that Trump may exploit a shutdown to sideline federal agencies, raising fears that this could be the most disruptive shutdown yet.

all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How about you Nazi fucks kiss my ass and find your own votes? The only thing a Democrat should say on the floor of Congress for the next two years is fucking "No".

Either the GOP can figure out a way to go around us, or they can find a different way to blow Hitler's ghost. And then we'll find another way to fuck with that plan.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

? The only thing a Democrat should say on the floor of Congress for the next two years is fucking

Or reading long ass books as a filibuster!!!

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Might I suggest the Harry Potter series to begin with.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I want comedy riffs. Have them all put together a tight five... Hours.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 29 points 2 years ago

The executive branch is spending money in ways Congress hasn't approved, so it would make sense for Congress to make that an issue.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think Trump will leverage the shutdown more than Democrats ever could. Trump will just keep the bits of government operating that he wants using a mix of IOUs he never plans to repay and money taken from the Treasury while the regular employees are away.

If Democrats are under the illusion that Trump will suddenly start playing by their rules just because they didn’t approve a budget….

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. This is why the Treasury was one of the first places DOGE went to. It was the keys to the kingdom. If they're siphoning money out (they already raked back a payment to New York State), they'll have money to pay their people while making anyone else suffer the shutdown.

Further, with Musk's personal valuation of wealth, he could literally just take out a massive loan with his wealth as collateral and pay their teams as well.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

…and list it as a political donation, which then would come off whatever taxes he still has to pay. So essentially, Musk’s taxes would be diverted directly to DOGE.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

To quote the brave democratic leader Jefferies when asked about the Democrats willingness to withhold votes: “I’m trying to figure out what leverage we actually have,” before going of on a rousing opposition speech about finding bipartisan solutions.

These assholes aren't going to do a damn thing here other than roll over and beg for another.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why is this even a debate

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago

Because of... You guessed it... Fucking Schumer and his merry band of saboteurs/fucking idiots.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Isn't Trump the one trying to shutdown the government?

[–] IcedSeraphine@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I would love to see this work, but come on, when has it?

[+] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

This is a lose/lose for Democrats. If they cooperate, it's awful messaging to their base. If they create a shutdown, now all the pain being felt is THEIR FAULT. Not to mention, it just plays into the "We didn't need these Federal workers" talking point.

They should have acted earlier. No planning, just reacting. Terrible, no skills politics.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The GOP has control over all branches of government. I don't see why the Democrats have to clean up ANY of their shit. They aren't creating a shutdown. That's GOP framing.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We are discussing the post, which is about Democrat support or not of a government shutdown. You don't have to participate in that discussion, but THAT'S THE DISCUSSION.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, your conclusion that this is a "lose/lose" for the Democrats is incorrect. I explained why in my comment. If you dont want to defend that position that's fine. You're under no obligation to respond to me or support what you say, but I'm clearly participating in the same discussion.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Democrats are a minority in both chambers of Congress. The Republicans should be able to pass a simple spending plan on a party line vote, and if they can't then their dysfunction is not and should never be treated as the Democrats' fault

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But you can't fool yourself into thinking that Trump, Musk, et. al., won't push that messaging from the bully pulpit, and the press won't AT LEAST half-cooperate.

It doesn't matter at all what SHOULD BE, or what IS NOT. The message is all that matters.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago

This rhetoric will, however, only work on their base. No centrist or leftist will swallow that.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a win if the Democrats really want one. Shutting down the government stops Doge, and cuts more than musk could ever dream of. They can frame it as Republicans trying to spend money and Democrats being about responsibility. Make it about a failure of Trump's leadership.

It's a tough line to walk, because a prolonged shutdown would possibly backfire, but it's probably worth the risk. Shutdowns do tend to hurt the party in power more than the opposition.

This is a way to slam the brakes on Trump and be an opposition party if they have the spine for it.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Genuinely, why do you think shutting down the government would stop doge??? You know they can just walk in and turn on computers themselves... And they'll just pay anyone who needs to put in a password claiming they're essential...

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It puts them in the tough spot of declaring Doge essential. That gives a huge opening for the Democrats to attack, when 80% of the government is shut down, that there is meaningful fraud in what Trump kept open. It's also going to be hard to get someone to come in to unlock things when they aren't getting paid. Even essential employees don't get paid in a shutdown, they get back pay after like everyone else when Congress approves it.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

They don't care man. They don't.