this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
198 points (98.5% liked)

News

36233 readers
2641 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump announced that the U.S. will impose 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports starting Monday, including from Canada and Mexico.

He also plans “reciprocal tariffs” on goods from countries imposing duties on U.S. products.

Markets reacted negatively, with stocks dropping over tariff concerns.

Trump previously paused tariffs on Canada and Mexico but imposed 10% duties on China.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is that how you bring manufacturing back to the US? By making all the materials way more expensive?

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Yep. When you're stuck paying more for the foreign metals, it forces the US suppliers to charge less. Right? 'Murica?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How many hours until he cancels these ones too?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Just long enough for him to get his knee pads to beg to Claudia Sheinbaum again.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna be another masterful gambit

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aluminum is going to change its atomic symbol to Al and the UK - great country, very bad prime minister - is going to name their aluminum "aluminium" to distinguish it from the great high-IQ American metal. I'm suspending the tariffs for 2 years and one and two half days. I'm a biggly stable genius.

  • Donald Trump, February 11 2025
[–] Honeybee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The worst part about this, for the first three sentences I couldnt if it was serious. Then I suspected it may be satire, but I cant tell 100 percent certain

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The main clue is that in reality Trump has no clue about what an atomic symbol is.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you think he announces these on weekends to soften the market drop?

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like he did that to us last time. So probably.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Then he doesn't do it. Pump and dump. Repeat.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A week ago, during the tariff on/tariff off bs, it was announced that:

The cost of aluminum for consumers in Europe buying on the physical market has dropped due to expectations that Canadian shipments under U.S. tariffs from Tuesday will be diverted, physical market traders said.

Here's hoping that stands.

https://globalnews.ca/news/10995839/canafa-aluminum-europe-trump-tariffs/

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trade threats 2, electric aluminoo.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

electric alumilieu?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Trump says he will announce 25% steel and aluminum tariffs Monday

it sounds to me like he announced them today

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm torn about this. On the one side, i support (a low level of) import tariffs in general, but on the other hand, the only reasonable exception i see to this is in minerals, because they are non-uniformously geographically distributed, and sometimes can only be sourced from abroad.

Then again, steel and aluminum are made from minerals which are so incredibly wide-spread, that it probably makes no difference to implement tariffs on them, because they can be sourced from every country, including your own.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Protectionism tends to sound good in theory. But in the end it doesn't turn out that way

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would be a bit more careful about only listening to previous empirical data. Not everything can be extrapolated from the past.

There is the story of the cock:

A rooster wakes up every morning and crows, for a 1000 days in a row. The rooster observes this and, as a consequence, believes himself to be invincible. "Until now, i have always waken up the next day in the morning."

But the rooster, is not invincible, neither is he immortal. In fact, quite the opposite.

Also, this XKCD:

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

O mean trump did the same thing in his last term. Well see