this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
651 points (99.2% liked)

tumblr

5445 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 116 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dammit you stole my joke lol

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Is there a maximum theoretical file size for a gender?

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

That's only for that puny site. I'm referring to something more akin to the information theoretic computer science concept of maximum gender file size, where you can't add in any more gender before the amount of information turns into a black hole.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Planck's gender

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

Insofar as gender is a social construct and potentially unique to a person, one could say that gender's maximum file size would be equal to an entity's conceptualization of their gender. While you might be able to parse out the "gender" portion of a standard human brain by mapping the various neural connections' patterns that form the basic archetypal building blocks that eventually model gender through their activation in series, that excludes the possibility of a non-human brain that could have a much more defined, complex conceptualization of gender. While there is likely an upper limit given inherent physical limitations in the emergent phenomenon of sapience, there is much yet to be explored in this topic.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you might consider asking fungi this question

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, then it just resets the scale

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

10MB ought to be enough for any gender.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It's surprising they would need more than 640kb, really.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The human genome is 200 gigabytes, but that only includes the biological sex. The average human brain can apparently store about 2500 terabytes, so about 2500.2 TB. This assumes that all genomes and neurons have an effect because you did ask for the maximum.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

2**64 genders ought to be enough for anybody.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That’s only the shareware version. Full DOOM took like 8 floppies.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

8 floppies? You need to pump those numbers up!

One of these days I'm going to find the backups for all of the .WAD files I got from random ass FTP sites in the early days of the Internet and I will die of nostalgia.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you can't find your backups, perhaps most of them are (linked from) here https://www.wad-archive.com/

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago

That is a rabbit hole I'm not going anywhere near a few hours before I have to go to work!

My next day off is going to be fun, though!

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 months ago

Nah it was 4 disks for the original 3 episodes. Doom 2 was 5, iirc

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

42.zip

(zip bomb that decompresses into a ...Yuge file.)

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have an alternative to the Twitter link?

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

I did not mean for it to be a link, TIL that the TLD .zip has a 42 e try that redirects to Elon's shit show.

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you think Nintendo will sue me if I identify as Super Mario 64 (8mb)?

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

welcome to the world Super Jario 69 (respects your pronouns but can't afford the legal fees to use them)

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 12 points 10 months ago

Dang there's a part of me that wants to be Doom

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 10 months ago

Fucking Doom nerds have now installed Doom as a gender.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Either three HD 3.5", or five 5 1/4".

Doom II was either five 3.5", or CD-ROM which was this thing only your rich mate had at the time.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you upload it enough times your gender can be the doom song

[–] SkaBunkel@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It always hurts a little when you have to show people how little space stuff used to need.

I like modern games with awesome graphics and sound quality, but I feel like we lost the ball a while ago on what is important in a game.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because storage was expensive back then compared to today. Like $280 for a 20MB 5.5 inch hard drive expensive.

[–] SkaBunkel@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well that and the machines didn't have the same performance as they do now. Now you can stream assets from the hard drive and render the game at the same time.

Games can be better now because we have objectively better hardware, and better ways of rendering assets.

I still feel like people are focusing too much on details that don't really contribute to the experience, only to throw AI at it, to make it run better. Effectively making the 4K textures and high Polly models pointless because you are going to look at an AI upscaled version anyway.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the compiled game...