this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
333 points (98.8% liked)

News

38498 readers
1135 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

CBS staff are outraged by reports that Paramount Global may settle Donald Trump’s lawsuit over a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris.

The lawsuit, widely dismissed as frivolous, has sparked newsroom backlash. “Trump’s lawsuit was a joke, but if we settle, we become the laughingstock,” a CBS correspondent said.

Critics fear Paramount is appeasing Trump to secure regulatory approval for its Skydance Media merger.

Bernie Sanders and others warn that caving to Trump undermines press independence and encourages further media intimidation.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 114 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Critics fear Paramount is appeasing Trump to secure regulatory approval for its Skydance Media merger

it was blackmail, no doubt there:

"do this or no deal."

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 42 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If they do it I really hope they get denied anyway

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Especially since corporate mergers is how the studio behind the Transformers movies get to influence public discourse in the first place.

Corporate consolidation: not even once

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

ahh, the art of the deal.. take your money and lie to your face today, and screw you over tomorrow.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

After this latest Star Trek Fiasco they really didn't need to do anything extra to convince me not to watch anything they produce. But they always go above and beyond.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 60 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like how they think settlement is going to keep them safe.

It is not. One you have paid the Danegeld, you will never be rid of the Dane.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 2 years ago

Danegeld

That's why he's threatening Denmark.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Bernie Sanders and others warn that caving to Trump undermines press independence and encourages further media intimidation."

Corpo fucks running CBS:

"Ummm.... I'm sorry can you show me where the part is that I'm supposed to give a fuck about there? Money. I want merger so I make more money. I pay the Don for protection and I make money. I don't see the issue here. Press freedom is for the plebs to care about. I'm rich."

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep corporations are nobody's friend but their own. And even then they're their Own Worst Enemy sometimes.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

All it really takes is not being a shitheel. That's what is most ethical and in their case most profitable, they literally cannot do it.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

There's no money in it for the this quarter. Their attention spans can't last any longer than that. It might make them a hundred times the money two years down the road. But they don't care

[–] EnIdiot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

These are all back door bribes for Trump. Meta did the same thing with $25 million

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Same as the Disney/Scarborough settlement. That case was a slam dunk for Disney lawyers. But there's no better way to pay a bribe.

They even settled oddly before a settlement would normally happen. There's a good LegalEagle about it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

This too, shall pass. And once it does, remember what suckerberg did, remember what all of them did, never forget

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Another part of The Assistance movement, I guess.