this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
121 points (95.5% liked)

News

36142 readers
3369 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 120 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So no more circumcisions now?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It looks like the actual language was precise enough to exclude circumcision... but that would have been hilarious.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's amazing about this is how targeted it is. They aren't actually concerned about protecting children from genital surgery (which isn't something anyone is doing on trans kids, anyway). The point is to write a narrative that makes them saviors and reasonable people monsters.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

(which isn’t something anyone is doing on trans kids, anyway).

Correction: it is being done on some trans kids- the ones who are saying "either you cut this off or I will." It does happen, but as a last ditch effort to stop actual mutilation or even death.

So you can imagine what will happen to such kids now.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yet not precise enough to be accurate to what medical professionals actually do or claim

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Circumcision definitely alters an individual’s sexual organs to minimize their natural biological functions.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That would be the one part of this I support. At least for medically unnecessary circumcisions.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

And ear piercings?

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child’s sex

The only thing more infuriating than Republicans being utterly incapable of understanding that NOBODY claims you can change your sex, is Republicans closing their eyes and covering their ears when everyone tells them that we're not claiming it.

They're blatantly putting words in our mouths at this point. Their ignorance is willful. It's either time we start fighting fire with fire, or someone needs to step up and start dishing out "Italian goodbyes".

(Edit):

irreversible medical interventions

It's hard enough for ADULTS to get GRS or T/E... On what fucking basis are they claiming children get these treatments?

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Trans woman to trans man: hey, I don't think you're using the extra parts of that second chromosome....let me just pluck pluck

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's not even possible to change your sex. We don't have that sort of genetic engineering capability.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

I wonder how you can spin this against oil companies pollution water and causing mutations in humans.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

40% of all breast reduction surgeries are performed on men. Sorry, dudes! You're going to have to live with those tits your body made after getting cancer (or just a slightly abnormal puberty).

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And cis women get them too, because giant breasts can play hell on your back. One of my wife's closest friends did it.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago

Better include circumcision

So this means they're committing to not slicing and dicing intersex babies genitals for them, forcing them into a false biological dichotomy?

Because it sounds like he just wrote an Executive Order that reads like it's trying to ban that.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

When bullets are fired from a gun, that’s a chemical reaction, right? Does this mean no more school kids will get shot as well?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago

The executive order said the United States will not “fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another.”

Had it been prior to this?

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How are children legally defined in the US?

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Age 17 and below.

Edit: oh but wow I just read the order and it defines child as anyone under 19. I'm surprised they chose to just add a year of childhood in this instance. That is not typical.

You are usually considered an adult at age 18 and granted a degree of autonomy (and the right to vote). Notable exceptions being controlled substances like alcohol and nicotine that require you to be 21.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a little strange that you are legally a child until so late in life.

Other countries have definitions like you are a youth at 14 to 16 and you have a different set of rights and responsibilities than a child.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's some rights and privileges granted to minors at 15 or 16, about driving and working. Age of consent tends to hover around 17 or 18 aside from a handful of states.

Edit: LOL @ the downvote.

So no surgeries at all then?

RIP kids

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 year ago

Well I mean given Trump's skin situation, maybe it's about that.

Nah, he's just an asshole who thinks trans people are icky and wants to make it their problem.

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I notice clerical mutilation is not on the list.