this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)

News

38366 readers
2529 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 56 points 1 year ago

Stopping immediately is a violation of our agreement with WHO and the world. It's illegal, AND wrong. The CDC should refuse.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really have to talk to the Don like you would to a 1 yo, otherwise he won't understand.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think only one person spoke to him in a manner that would be effective. They unfortunately... Miscommunicated

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm having trouble with the second half of this headline. Who honestly expected an orderly and extended withdrawal from this guy?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's required by law. The US has made commitments.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No argument here. It's illegal. But how could anyone be paying attention expect that to stop him?

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

who expected "an extended withdrawal", who expects and extended anything with trump, i mean, what, were none of these people sentient during his last administration, he did whatever he wanted whenever he wanted and changed his mind when he liked, and threw everything into chaos on a whim

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And knowing this, we collectively should do everything possible to stop his BS.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried, I voted, my people voted, we overwhelmingly voted for Kamala Harris (as we've overwhelmingly have voted straight ticket Democrat for the last 100 years), you know who overwhemlingly didn't vote for Kamala Harris, "progressive" leftists who wanted to protest Jews in support of Islamofacist terrorists. I'm a bit over "we" at the moment. Young Democrats couldn't recognize the moment, or the responsibility they were entrusted with in a safe, free, and fair election, and didn't turn out to do the simplest easiest lowest effort action possible, in filling out a ballot for Kamala Harris, instead sitting it out and virtue signaling, wasting their vote. I've zero faith in any sustained effective "resistance" from anyone at all, and regardless, me and my Zionist friends aren't welcome in the "progressive" circlejerks the do nothings will be hosting.

[–] HarryOru@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

you know who overwhemlingly didn't vote for Kamala Harris, "progressive" leftists who wanted to protest Jews in support of Islamofacist terrorists.

Thank you for saying this. Tolerance paradox paradoxing hard; I will never understand those people and their naive, stubborn black-and-white thinking.