this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
445 points (98.9% liked)

memes

18698 readers
1802 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

please just burst already.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been edging this bubble for years

It's gonna be NICE

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

New York stock exchange

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now imagine how people who've waited for the bitcoin bubble to burst feel

[–] wdx@feddit.org 14 points 1 year ago

Me waiting for the housing market: 💀

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Every single company pouring money into the incinerator is positive they'll be the one to crack actually useful AI or even actual GAI.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean LLMs are already very useful when used correctly, it's just 98% of the time they aren't used correctly

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

How do I use it “correctly”

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're decent at language tasks. So, if you provide them with all the information and configure them to not make up any of their own, then they can do things like rewriting it in a different style or different language relatively competently.

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and configure them to not make up any of their own

That's the trillion dollar puzzle nobody has been able to solve yet. It's not trivial at all, even when it seems like it should be.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

We used one to come up with a name for a feature cocktail at work. It's pretty good for that kind of stuff.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I had some files that i knew had duplicates, but didn't exactly match and while the filenames were not identical, you could tell by looking if they were the same.

Would have been very tedious to do all of them, LLM was able to identify a "good enough" number of duplicates and only made a few mistakes. Greatly sped up the manual work required to clean up the collection.

But that's so far from most advertised scenarios and not compelling from a "make lots of money" perspective.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Correctly " is a term that has several different uses and meanings. Depending on the context, "Correctly" can mean:

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You use it for pointers and double check the results. I've had a lot of luck using it to explain terminology for complicated specialized tasks for trades work and stuff recently.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah. They just believe it will make stock values increase (or that not doing thr AI thing will cause stock values to decrease).

Remember, a publically traded company produces shareholder value. How they do it doesn't matter.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine how much more valuable alphabet stocks would be if they hadn't destroyed the core design and user experience of their search engine 😅

Most of the current value of AI comes from the fact that Google is useless now.

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i really really do not trust any of those cunts with agi.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago

my only hope for AGI is that it gets open sourced and is easily runnable on sub $10,000 hardware.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How is Nvidia so high up the chart?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The people selling the shovels made more money than the miners during the gold rush. It's the same thing here. If you want to do AI at any sort of scale, Nvidia is really your only choice because AMD and Intel sat on their hands for so long.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the profit, zero risk. Selling shovels is always better.

[–] HansGruber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except when no one wants shovels anymore.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

That's the trick, people will always want shovels. Even after the gold rush ends, the only difference is demand for shovels goes back to normal, it doesn't disappear.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It is a shock, but at least they received their money without being left holding the bag. They have a committed backlog over a year long, they seem to be avoiding manufacturing more than they have already sold ..

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Ahh, right.

There are some legit use cases for AI, so they will no doubt make a decent amount of money in the future from it.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When the AI bubble burst, they've already made their cash selling shovels (being very anticompetitive) and walk away. Their startup competitors wither, and they are set for the next "thing."

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Anticompetitive? Nobody showed up to compete. Nvidia has been developing Cuda and AI tools for many years. AMD and Intel ignored the market segment because it was a niche market for so long.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Pop that bastard asap

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What I fear is, with Elongated Muskrat being dangerously close to the government and being invested in AI, we will get them immediately bailed out and/or consolidated into even less hands, even more deregulations, and maybe even some changes to copyright so it will expcilitly will allow not only the training on such material, but also the copyrighting of the output of generative AI.

[–] Henry@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago