this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
61 points (89.6% liked)

News

37661 readers
1552 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh... What? The US has twice the aircraft carriers as every other country combined

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes but China has been rolling out some impressive new ships that the US doesn’t have for awhile now on top of their recent aviation announcements so people are getting a little concerned

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any excuse for shinier boats

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that. The US DoD has been playing this trick since the end of WW2, and it keeps working.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

It keeps working because every politician in this slavemaster system supports it completely.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China doesn't have shit to challenge the U.S.

They don't have the experience, the doctrine, or the technology.

Anyone who considers China a legitimate naval threat is vastly overstating China's capabilities.

The only thing they are capable of is bullying tiny countries.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

exactly so let's say I'm way stronger than you but you start working out hard, so will I hopefully you never catch up

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oooofff, I'll get the popcorn.

Let's see what our proportional retaliation will be.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Paywalled but from what little I can see, the only response is: DUH!

I imagine if I were able to read it, it’s just hand wringing and fan service to the military industrial complex, no real substance. Aside from the military, shipbuilding left this country decades ago and no one seems to want to do anything about it. We can’t even manage taking care of our own infrastructure, build an EV supply chain when there was no competition yet, or restore the microprocessor supply chain we still have some of. I don’t see how anything happens here, especially if we’re focusing on cutting government services for the next four years

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We can't afford to do things like infrastructure because we spend all our money on massive overkill naval (etc.) superiority. If these "fears" are founded at all, it could only be due to us making the blunder of "fighting the last war" and wasting trillions of dollars on the wrong tech (e.g. going all-in on aircraft carriers that are alarmingly vulnerable to modern missile attacks), not failing to budget [way more than] enough money to begin with.

[–] comador@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you kindly! I browse Lemmy on my phone and never figured out how to do that on the tiny screen

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Car dependency is a fundamentally unsustainable con. We will never be able to maintain that garbage infrastructure. Yet the preservation of this moronic privilege is a primary goal of the MIC. It's a self-eating snake that poops gold for warmongers.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The MIC "fears" slowing down its planet-destroying profits.