this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
302 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26925 readers
2287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s transition team is relying on private email servers, raising security concerns among federal officials who fear potential hacking and misuse of sensitive information.

The White House has instructed agencies to limit electronic sharing and instead offer in-person briefings or reading room access for sensitive materials.

Federal employees are wary of transmitting classified or personnel data to unsecured servers, with some requiring transition officials to verify compliance with security standards.

The reliance on private emails is slowing the transfer of government materials ahead of Trump’s inauguration.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 224 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You see. _her emails _ were a problem. His emails are fine.

See how it works?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that the media ignored that both Bush and the Trump admin conducted all their business over private emails is one of the biggest betrayals

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn’t betray us. They never were for us in the first.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The "4th estate" is owned by the same people who own the first three

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Butt Tizzy Males

[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The hypocrisy IS the point. It signals to his supporters that it's okay to do things that are wrong as long as you're with him

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans are hypocrites. Always have been. Their voters are fine with it. This is why they don’t lose votes.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defends Matt Gaetz, calls Democrats pedophiles.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I still laugh when I see that "Pedophiles for Trump" sign showing up in various pics...

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Lock him up (for any of his several dozen felonies).

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

And republicans say pronouns aren’t a thing 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Trumps little fascist circle is gonna get breached. I promise.

There's no fucking way their team is competent enough to manage their own security. It's likely that a lot of their data is already getting scraped by corporations.

Nation state actors will have several of their devices compromised before he's even in office.

Any APT worth their salt will see them as a valuable target. I can't wait for this shit to splatter all over them.

Too bad we probably wont hear about it for many years if whoever gets in is talented.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This already happened during his first administration. His family was using private e-mail and all of them were using unsecured devices. The news covered it and conservatives covered their ears.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You make it sound like they are ignorant when they are instead hiding evidence of corruption from government servers.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not my intent. They are for sure up to no good. Even worse it shows their total disregard for our social contract the basic way our gov't should function at the highest levels. Because, as long as they have power there isn't any system or institution that can hold them accountable.

The supreme court has shown over and over again they are completely unwilling to police themselves. Yet we are expected to abide by their decisions? Congress ignoring their oath of office failed to remove Trump during his first term. Instead choosing party over country.

We are not a new democracy. The fact that so many of our citizens support this insanity is really sad.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

You realize he already was, right? A security researcher in the NL breached Trumps' Twitter. Twice.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is it a breach if they were invited in?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. Most breaches are through social engineering where you effectively have someone invite you in.

It's also why most hackers are known to sit in the dark. Most of them are actually vampires.

[–] SleepyBear@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im not saying to do it, but it would be absolutely SO funny if someone hacked the Donvict's emails and started making some information public that they would rather have stay private. Just saying, it would be hilarious

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

It's OK you can't get arrested for hoping the president gets hacked.

Yet.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If only some Anonymous hacktivists were to take on this task!

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

butter emails!

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As if he knows how to use a laptop.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Speak n Putin

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's permanently got the McDonald's app loaded.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is all done on purpose.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You really think he wants China and Russia and North Korea and Israel to steal his communications? I dont see why.

No, I think this is just stupidity

Absolutely. Trump wants to sell that info, not give it away!

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

(reading title) Wait, Trump's trans? Do I need to use new pronouns? Is it really going to be "but her emails" again but for Donna Trump?

[–] Hatshepsut@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Making sure there’s no traceable evidence of any of the nightmares they’re cooking up. But that’ll never happen anyway, fucker’s going to get away with it all. But I’m sure Vlad’s guys hooked him up nicely, perhaps as a welcome back gesture.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's so cute that anyone thinks those servers are remotely locked down. You saw the massive tech brains with the "evidence" that voting machines were hacked.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wait I thought this was sooper dooper unlegal, you guyz!!!

Oh, it was a female Democrat doing it....nevermind.