this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
146 points (96.2% liked)

News

36233 readers
2528 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 116 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Why can't we just get rid of gendered restrooms altogether?

Just have a room with fully enclosed rooms for a toilet and then a common area for the sinks. Get rid of those stupid flimsy walls with cracks everywhere and two feet of space beneath the door and just have a bunch of individual rooms with a toilet in them. Guys can pee in a toilet, they don't need a uniral.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of bathrooms in Sweden are like this. It's so nice to be able to go to the bathroom without people peeking at you through the stall cracks and hearing your every movement.

load more comments (1 replies)

There's at least one high school in Minneapolis that's done this. Apparently it's actually going really well.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Because the pearl clutchers won't let them.

[–] murtaza64@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My college dorm was like this. Every bathroom was ungendered. The stalls weren't fully floor to ceiling, but were slightly better than the average public bathroom. 99% of people got over it after a little culture shock at the very beginning (maybe 2-3 days).

There was still one women-only bathroom in my building; I believe it was for a few students who asked for religious consideration. No biggie though for almost every student.

It only led to one embarrassing moment for me: I (a guy) was singing Frank Ocean at the top of my lungs while showering. When I came out of the shower a girl was brushing her teeth and made eye contact with me and kind of snickered/giggled. Racewalked back to my room 💀

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I will not give up urinals. They're so much faster and more efficient. Have you SEEN the lines for women's restrooms?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

As much as I agree, that will cost money, therefore it won't happen. I feel the only way a place will do anything that I beneficial to the end user/customer is if it is profitable for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“She believes that referring to another person using pronouns that do not correspond with that person’s biological sex is harmful to that person because it is false and harmful to herself because it forces her to lie by denying her religious beliefs and scientific evidence,” it continues.

Do you need another strand of pearls because you clutched the first one too hard, Karen?

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

No, but I could use some chalk. My brain hands were slipping during that round of mental gymnastics.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Someone should send her a box of white bead necklaces lmao

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can trans students sue to avoid sharing a restroom with cis classmates?

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago

Can students sue to avoid sharing a restroom with bigots if that is against my religion?

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can I sue to avoid sharing a bathroom with anyone?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would support this lawsuit. With an added provision that if it must be a shared public bathroom, if someone talks to you for a non-emergency reason: 10 years to life. Especially if they try to have an actual chat. That's just felonious.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can we have eye contact be a gross misdemeanor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

This seems to have some merit.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (32 children)

There's no previous cases of assault or harassment of cis people by trans people for using the bathroom. Their fears are not valid. It's as valid as a student suing because they have a phobia of the color grey and can't be forced to use a bathroom that has any grey in it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The stupidest part to me is that cis women could also potentially assault other cis women in public restrooms but these bigots haven’t even considered that possibility.

Also, if you are a cis man and are just desperate to sexually assault a woman in a public restroom, I would think that a janitor’s uniform and a mop would be enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago

Cab I, a cis person, sue for being required to share a bathroom with other cis people?

I don't want to share bathrooms, thank you. That's a violation of my religious beliefs (in my religion, pooping is a sin).

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Why are we letting conservatives into public restrooms? They are notorious child-rapists and are known to attack innocent people in bathrooms if they don't like the look of them.

There is no room for conservatism or other hate-based ideologies in a modern civilization.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Sounds a bit like the ol' 'gay panic' defense.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like Jim Crow era segregation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

That's exactly what it is. "These children could be raped by a trans person!" Or they could be raped by a cis person. Of their own gender or another gender.

In general, it's not hard to find a time to sneak into a bathroom when no one's looking. It's not like they're usually in some prominent place.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cool, they want to return to separate but equal. Fucking weirdos.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think they're interested in the "equal" part at all.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It never was equal, tho. Thats just the mantra they used to justify the segregation

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

The American right: "I am so aroused by pissing and shitting and farting that I cannot pee downward if trans children are in earshot of me!"

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is amazing how few problems people have that they have the time and energy to spend on non issues like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can the trans students sue for being harassed and bullied? That would be great

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

My daughter has a very close trans friend (who the school forces to use the girl's room anyway). A girl was being a bigot to him in the bathroom, so he slapped her. Guess who did not get in trouble?

Hint: not the openly queer one.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Okay fine, fine, the boys don't have to share a bathroom with trans girls anymore.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Simple protest is just smash urinals or pour something like concrete into them. After a couple repairs, they will just start replacing them all with stalls... then there will be no difference between bathrooms.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just a reminder that you can sue for just about anything. That doesn't mean you have a chance in hell of winning.

load more comments
view more: next ›