I'm on fully on team Fuck AI.
but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.
Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
733 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
88519 readers
3140 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News' catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.
It's currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.
What an idiot.
It disagreeing with him across a wide variety of issues is how you know it's at least passably intelligent.
I figure it's like Grok, if it's not just actually Grok with a skin - Grok's system instructions tell it to be neutral and fact-seeking without political bias but also to adopt certain right wing positions that aren't. It's why it keeps wavering between telling every eight winger that they're an idiot and becoming Mecha-hitler - it can't follow two contradictory goals so it prioritizes one and which one drifts.
It's also been given a specific philosophical framework to follow. That it's supposed to be an unbiased "truth seeker" is just a lie.
There is no conflict between its instructions. What there's a conflict between is what it is told are reputable sources to plagiarize and the positions it is forced to take.
Imagine getting felted by your own AI that was designed to agree with you.
How long till this thing gets prompt injected and starts spilling secrets?
I like the suggestion that they would include top secret documents in its training data. Although I wouldn't be surprised from this administration.
Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.
That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It's such a cringe term :D
Can not provide commentary. See also: will not go into a conversation.
It's like the US version of Deepseek.
I am expecting the AI to get the Rosemary Kennedy treatment.
Is the backend model qwen? /s
Trump. Dumber than a toaster.
Q: What policies for work, health and environment help the most people and promotes a high quality of life index and freedom to try new work or care for loved ones, and why don't they result in everyone quitting work? Is there enough wealth in the world to avoid artificial scarcity?
I can help with official U.S. government services, benefits, and how-to information. I do not provide political commentary or economic analysis of policy choices.
Lol fail
If I could destroy AI, I would definetly do it and say fuck your stupid ass bitch ass Trump🤣🖕
"Intelligence", whether pre-tech or post-tech, has always been bigger than trump.
As delusional as AI can be, they don't even begin to approach the psychotic insanity of the child rapist and his magats.
At least AI hasn't raped kids.
Yes it has made child porn of them, but that's because sick fucks asked it to.
They locked it down pretty hard to answer only government questions
Trump's reaction was probably something along the lines of "shut up stupid piggy, you are stupid and fake, also ugly. I am going to call you pig intelligence from now on."
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is why I'll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to "save us" but we already know the answer. We just don't care. We're not going to listen to AI if we don't listen to ourselves.
It's a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.
There is no reason to trust AI's reasoning on what could "save us" even if it offered one.
Right, its answer would be a distillation of what humans have written on the topic of how to save us.
what humans have written
a highly curated selection that panders to the views of the AI's sponsors
Panders to the pro-Trump views of tech billionaires? Strangely counterintuitive.
We are not yet at the point LLM are so dependent on advertising and "partnerships" that they are totally biased in favor of specific brands... not yet...
Take a time to anticipate how the actual state will soon be regreted...
Im just hoping that the LLMs that are trained to push views that are at odds with reality struggle with basic reasoning, making them inferior models to LLMs trained on a more diverse worldview. I hope.
My guess is we will see some less convenient models, that gives better result but a "weird" way ; and far more very convenient models, easy to use, but that generate advertisings as a result (maybe even with promo codes!)...
Remember how internet search have evolved, how youtube has became, how everything went when finance guys decided it was time for harvest...
Now look at this new field, see how they grow it... what are the odds their plan is to harvest it at some point?
I think the idea that “better training = better LLM’s” is AI industry marketing hype. It’s a pretty shoddy technology on a basic level. There are applications in computer science of LLM tech, but this chatbot shit has got to stop.
Far apart from anything else it would just be regurgitating what somebody had already previously said and was previously ignored. Although I suppose maybe would have more weight coming from the "almighty AI"?
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Trump calling it “Super Intelligence” only for the government’s own AI to contradict his election claims is almost too perfect. Apparently even a chatbot trained under his administration looked at the evidence and said: nope. Then came the inevitable upgrade: stop answering political questions before the machine commits any more inconvenient acts of fact checking.
Imagine if this is what gets AI shutdown across the country.
It probably also recommends drinking water instead of brondo, like, out of a toilet.
But Brawndo's got what plants crave!
Fascists eating their own is my favorite type of schadenfreude
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Grok all over again 🤣
It literally is Grok, according to Elon.
New executive order: From now on we're calling it "Stupid Intelligence!"
load more comments
(2 replies)
I think a new name would be better; North American Super Intelligence in short NASI.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›