this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
559 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

12171 readers
3124 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 hours ago

I miss the good honest deception of spending hours trying to make misinformation pieces for fun. Truly, people are too lazy to even hoax authentically anymore, truly a shame.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm old enough to remember when Photoshop became a thing and everyone said it was the end of the world as we know it.

That we won't be able to trust images ever again, that people would use it to mass produce misinformation and it would lead to abuse.

I can't tell if that was a mad panic or if that's exactly what happened though.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I remember that too, except it took actual talent to do so in those days. Back in the days, we had like one or two images the far-right made and claimed to be real. Now we have thousands if not millions.

[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

As ever, Jasc PaintShop Pro lies sad and forgotten :'(

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because Corel bought it up and ruined it.

BTW, those image macro memes with the Impact font? Originally they were made with Paint Shop Pro, as it had built-in support for text outlines. In Photoshop, you have to fiddle with it to get that thing working.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

I dunno, I think it was sad and forgotten even before Corel bought it. Also Corel has a soft spot in my heart due to the free copy of Corel Painter that was included with the graphics tablet my granny bought me in the early 2000s.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 hours ago

Really annoys me that people look at old shopped images or CGI videos and go "I think this is AI".

I saw someone reposting this video and people were like "oh that's got to be AI" but no, it's a Blender video from 2021, guys.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I've been using a borrowed version of Cs6 for so long, I'm honestly afraid what autocorrect/autotune nonsense has been baked into the whole Adobe platform that is just part of the modern creatives work flow.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 54 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

A co-worker recently asked which AI I used to make some drawings in a presentation. I made them all by hand in Inkscape, so I'm not sure if I should feel good or bad about the question.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

My coworkers asked me to make a poster with AI, I made it with LibreOffice Draw instead.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 32 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

It’s just awful these days. I was presenting the other day with some co-workers. One made a nice looking edit to a slide, but had some typos. I asked for the original since the slide was just a rendered image. The response I got was the prompt they used to generate the slide in copilot “give me an engaging slide using this information…”

I re-drew the damn thing in like 5 minutes myself, but jebus, this is what counts as work these days?

[–] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 hours ago

I've watched my niece and nephews do their homework and since it's all done online, they literally copypaste the question into chatgpt, then copypaste the answer.

This is what happens when you ditch pen and paper (there have also been studies showing that handwriting activates different parts of the brain that increases memory retention or something like that, too lazy to look it up). Anyway, we can look forward to gen alpha coworkers not knowing how to do anything if this is how they do their homework.

[–] ivan@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I’m lucky to have colleagues that understand that doing things with AI, that are supposed to reach some audience, will feel low effort to said audience. Like, if I’m tryna sell someone my shit I better not half-ass advertising. Not to mention broken telephone game of me explaining stuff to AI for AI to explain it to potential clientele.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 3 points 13 hours ago

I’m in a relatively high up position, so the audience was the C level types. I find they tend to prefer the AI type responses, mine tend to be a bit information dense.

So, my workflow now is to draft, put it through AI then re-edit to remove the typical AI hallmarks.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You should’ve kept the original slide and made sure to give them credit when presenting it: “and before we go to the next slide, I wanted to give a huge thank you to so-and-so for their contribution to this presentation!” *everybody claps*

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It was someone in a higher position than I, and I’m 4 months in to the role. So…

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

I'd have flipped tables.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

“My own.”

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 56 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] M137@lemmy.today 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 6 points 7 hours ago
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 13 hours ago

"It was GIMPed"

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago

Time to go back to commissioning portraits from painters who forage to make their own pigments.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 11 points 15 hours ago

Latest version of photoshop keeps pushing AI tools anyway, so they're interchangeable imo

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 4 points 12 hours ago

MS paint still with a niche following

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 16 hours ago

Adobe, rest in piss.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

The shadows on this post are all wrong.

[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Went from Photoshop: I can tell by the pixels. To AI: I can tell by the fingers.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

They seemed to have figured out fingers for the most part, but it's the empty eyes that freak me out. I can't express it very well but they all see to have no "focus," as if they're staring into the void even though they almost always depict people who are taking part in some sort of activity.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's fucking sad and funny thinking about the (subscription) versions of Photoshop released in the last couple of years, ones where Adobe added AI-based tools.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 14 hours ago

TBH you cN usually tell a photoshop from an AI, but Adobe outlived its relevance regardless.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

wt:retouch

Verb

retouch (third-person singular simple present retouches, present participle retouching, simple past and past participle retouched)

  1. (transitive) To improve something (especially a photograph), by adding or correcting details, or by removing flaws.

a. 1701 (date written), John Dryden, “Epistle the Fourteenth. To Sir Godfrey Kneller, Principal Painter to His Majesty.”, in The Miscellaneous Works of John Dryden, […], volume II, London: […] J[acob] and R[ichard] Tonson, […], published 1760, →OCLC, page 201:

For time ſhall with his ready pencil ſtand;

Retouch your figures with his ripening hand;

Mellow your colors, and imbrown the teint;

Add every grace, which time alone can grant;

To future ages ſhall your fame convey,

And give more beauties than he takes away.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I remember an article from the 90s that first mentioned 'computer doctoring' in terms of photo manipulation. Before Photoshop become well known, the practice was called doctoring.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Photos were 'Airbrushed' before that, more for removing blemishes or making models thinner.

[–] jam12705@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Always preferred Micrographics Picture Publisher.

[–] expletivedeleted@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

Pretty sure humans still use Photoshop, and LLMs are being trained on their work.

What end of an era?

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Will CGI be the next to go?

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So people don't know how to use language anymore?

Or is tech literacy so low that people don't even understand the difference between an edited image, and some absurd slop generated bt a trash machine?

[–] lena 9 points 17 hours ago

Yes

Imagine how stupid the average person is, and then consider that half of them are stupider