this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
615 points (98.4% liked)

Comic Strips

25478 readers
2370 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/45744344

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/roach-2

Alt textThis isn't a metaphor. Just a story about a roach.

Bonus panelBonus panel

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You mean like Musk throwing a rock at an "unbreakable" window?

[–] clifmo@programming.dev 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That was genuinely an embarrassment for him, and probably hurt cyber truck sales. More like, sharing his vile racist tweets or video of him performing a Nazi salute

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody in the world bought cubic truck based on it's merits. It's an ideological purchase, and nothing those goobers do or say changes their camp, so it can't hurt or boost the sales.

[–] clifmo@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Agree or disagree, I don't think this is the most apt Musk observation

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

I'll go to the grave believing it was either intentional or Musk said 'fuck it, if it breaks, it breaks'. I have no proof of it, but as soon as I saw it something in me said 'come on...'. Call it extroverted intuition..

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The number of people, mostly women, getting outraged about Sydney Sweeney right now shows this very much still happens.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

And now I have to go Google what you are talking about, making you that guy 😜

Edit: So you don't have to Google it: some apparently famous woman appears in an ad for a company without morals who profits off of exploiting addiction and ignorance, and she is almost entirely nude in most of the ads

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

she is almost entirely nude in most of the ads

That will stop people from looking it up.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

LOL

I'm glad you agree 😜

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Dunno why though. The internet is full of actual porn, why bother going to look for some g rated pseudo porn that's actually just an ad?

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

In the same vain, most tits look very similar, so if you saw like 10 different pairs, you get the gist of it and you wouldn't be surprised by new ones. Yet, for some reason, people keep looking at photos of bare chested women all the time, over and over again.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

We really hangout with different type of people huh

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I totally definitely did not just look it up

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

For those who need slightly more info to not Google it, some actress reached out to some ~~sports betting site~~ (edit:shoe company) and spearheaded an ad that is basically a sports illustrated "body issue" where she puts on some gear or holds some sportsball or stick in front of the naughty bits. The whole controversy is about the sexualization of women on sports (obviously)

Tap for spoilerThat's my 2 minute analysis while on my morning walk, so take it with a container of salt

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The amount of right wing men who pretend that a big number of women is outraged about her is way, way larger. To the point that I can safely call it astroturfed campaign.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But these ads definitely don't work on me because I'm just built different 😀

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 32 points 22 hours ago

Ads can't work on you if you never see them

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

"These don't work on me because I don't have any friends, connections, or value!"

Recently an ad caught my eye by showing somebody putting mustard and ketchup on the shoes on their feet. I have no clue what they were selling.

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Look, this politician says really stupid things. Let's all point out how stupid he is, share it, comment on it and boost it in any possible way.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

My preferred curse for journalism is that every time they announce the statement of someone totally unqualified, like Trump, they must also announce the statement of someone equally unqualified, like a drunkard on the street who believes they’re all lizard people that were sent by the Egyptian pharoahs.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 8 points 18 hours ago

"This ad annoys me, which makes me not want to buy the product! Hey everyone, isn't this ad annoying?"

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 22 hours ago

Nowadays it's "look at this ugly AI image someone made"

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That plan only works when the ad is not so controversial that it makes people want to boycott the company.

Because now I am boycotting that company even though I really needed to replace my shoes and already had them picked out.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I boycotted Canadian tire for years because of their annoying commercials with that guy they tried to write as a normal guy that would talk about Canadian tire products in natural situations... that felt so contrived and fake he just came off as some loser corporate shrill. I remember the first ad was actually for some windshield wipers that looked pretty good but the ads were so off putting I not only didn't buy those wipers but didn't step foot in their stores at all until a while after they got rid of that guy (which also sucked for him because he was just some actor doing what some dumbass marketing writers and directors told him to and it did hurt his career because a lot of people hated those ads).

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This assumes you're in the market for the product / can boycott it.

For example the biggest culprit of this in my area are ads saying "stop hiring humans" for some AI company. I may hate the company, but my opinion doesn't matter. The only people that would be in the market for something like that are ghoulish CEOs who just view employees as a cost on their balance sheet. If that ad can make them laugh and look into your product, it doesn't matter if the other 99% if people hate your company.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 4 hours ago

This assumes you're in the market for the product / can boycott it.

And it's a correct assumption otherwise the entire point of the meme makes no sense since someone will use it anyway

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Well yes, in this instance I assumed they were talking about the converse ad, and I was literally about to buy some new shoes from them cause my favourite ones just ripped. I saw the ad, will now find another brand to purchase from.

[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

Apparently this is the same guy from 'Stop drinking, becomes good for society' advert.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What's the ad so I can look at it?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i hate to be the person giving them exposure, but at the point where they went through bbc and nyt, i don't think that few people on lemmy make a difference...

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crwyzj53pl1lo

Converse pulls 'deeply upsetting' advert after backlash

American footwear brand Converse has pulled an advert that social media users said evoked Ku Klux Klan imagery, saying it recognised "that we got this wrong".

The photo, posted to the company's Instagram account, received backlash online after critics described lighting in the image as looking like a white pointed hood.

A pair of shoes, dangling in the picture, were also likened to an image of a lynching victim by social media users.

I assumed it was about that recent Converse ad that looked like a KKK hood with someone hanging. When I read the headline about that I thought β€˜that has to be an exaggeration or a reach’, but then I searched for it and went oh naw, the people that saw that at first glance weren’t reaching. I can see how an office full of marketing people with zero perspective could miss it, but I feel like most normal people would go β€˜damn bro that kinda looks like a KKK hood’.

[–] Aralakh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My first thought was the recent Sydney Sweeney sport betting ad. The fact that we're having a thread like this, I feel seems to highlight the witty-ness of this comic lol.

[–] frog@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh... I though the ad was the Roach Poison.

It's controversial because roaches don't share the food, they die and the other roaches cannibalizes each other.

...

Um... I might be reading too much in to this. I am probably completely wrong.

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the ad is the roach poison. it's just saying we poison people in our circle by sharing negative content, and that it's controversial by design.

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 2 points 1 day ago

Last time I remember this happening is fake ads for 'the boys' Amazon series.

[–] Ertain@feddit.online 4 points 1 day ago

Got to love Zack and his satire.