this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
157 points (93.4% liked)

Europe

12410 readers
834 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...

Polish Foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorksi said a victory against Vladimir Putin’s forces would be swift due to the “overwhelming superiority” of its air forces, even without support from the United States.

“If Russia attacked us and we took our gloves off, I think we would defeat Russia quite quickly. We have overwhelming superiority over Russia in air power. General, correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s something like 2,500 aircraft,” he said during a discussion at the Yalta European Strategy meeting in Kyiv on Saturday.

“Even without the US it’s still overwhelming, and I haven’t checked recently how many F-35s and JASSMs and all the deep-strike capabilities we have.”

...

He went further to say that Poland could knock out half of Russia’s refining capacity in a matter of weeks. The comments were in relation to a potential conflict between Russia and Nato and not about the prospect of a direct war between Russia and Poland.

“But if the Ukrainians have knocked out half of Russia’s refining capacity in six months, we could do it in six weeks and take out the other half,” he continued.

Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused Sikorski of “Russophobia of the brain” in discussing the conflict.

Speculation has abounded that Moscow is plotting to attack Nato, claims that the country has denied.

...

Last month CIA director John Ratcliffe made a short trip to Moscow - the last time that a CIA chief visited the country personally was in the weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Several sources familiar with the discussions told CBS News that Ratcliffe had made the visit to warn Russia against an attack on Nato.

...

Archived

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (30 children)

Clickbait title again! 😡

"If Russia attacked us and we took our gloves off, I think we would defeat Russia quite quickly."

Yes, agreed. There isn't even any bluster in that statement. And I think NATO agrees that this option isn't off the table.

But a cornered animal will do weird pointless self-destructive things, and it's possible it still has one or two functioning nukes...


edit:

I'm getting replies that seem to assume that I just dismissed Russia as toothless. I haven't said that.

I had a closer look at some articles about all that, and while most stick to the "official" numbers, and while it can be said with certainty that Russia has and is actively developing some nuclear weapons, there is no definity about how many there actually are or if they are deployable or even working. Careful phrasing like "it is generally estimated" or "Moscow claimed" is prevalent.

And that's the problem. As long as Russia is what it is we will never know. But they're not doing well and I think it's fair to speculate that the "official" numbers might not reflect reality anymore.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] freshfusion@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In war you can have all the advantages you can think about and still lose. Overconfidence about military supremacy has a huge cost if the war proceeds.

Germany in WW1 entered it avoiding attempts at deescalation, because it was overconfident it would overwhelm France and Russia. Both France and later USA had to withdraw from Vietnam. For recent example Russo-Ukranian war had Russia at clear advantage in manpower and industry, but we know now in retrospect, that it was not a couple of week pacification campaign as even myself was convinced it would be.

I guess that statement was likely a diplomatic posturing, but keep in mind that military conflicts very rarely go according to plan. The only certain thing that happens is human suffering inherent to military conflicts.

[–] majster@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you can safely add Israel/USA - Iran war to the list of fuckups. WWI should be lesson for everyone that overconfidence can kill tens of millions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The problem isnt defeating russia or pushing it back. It it doing so while not triggering a nuclear response. So salami tactics it is. Currently russia loses entire generations on foreign battlefield. Signs of internal collapse are there.

I just feel like we should investigate russias sponsors like china and stop or threaten to stop trade with them plus finance their antagonists like pakistan (eww) or taiwan or whatever group gives them trouble.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

No one can put the brakes on China without going into an immediate recession. The cost of ceasing trade with China will be catastrophic for both parties and trigger a war.

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No one can put the brakes on China without going into an immediate recession.

I am not sure whether there will be a recession, but China will suffer much more (and earlier) as soon as such a trade war begins. The Chinese economy is heavily dependent on exports.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I expect this to only work like that if done by enough countries in coordination, otherwise China will likely trade with others more, and suffer way less than the ones trying to pull them. But I hope we will not have to witness if that is so

[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

all imperial powers rely on expanding markets. your sovereign too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

finance their antagonists like pakistan

Pakistan is on China's side. They have their newest AA rockets.

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thought they got their nukes from USA but might be wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm just here for the tankie posts

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right now russia has almost no reserve left to fight the EU. We know that it won't be nato because nato would include the US which isn't interested in fighting russia.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah they said that about Nazi Germany as well. The world couldn't stand a United States that tried to keep to itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We know that it won't be nato because nato would include the US which isn't interested in fighting russia.

This is a conversation about what Russia will choose to do. If Russia attacks NATO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I don't believe you. Prove it.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Not a fan of this guy, but he's absolutely right about this one. Assuming the US wouldn't actively aid Russia, which isn't exactly guaranteed.

Russia only attacked Ukraine, because it was weak, vulnerable, and alone. None of these are true for the EU. Attacking any EU country would be suicide.

NATO is worthless, because it only does what its leader says. It's not a reliable security guarantee, and it's precisely why we're even talking about this to begin with.

As opposed to NATO Article 5 only requiring members to provide support thay they deem necessary, Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union requires all members states to 'aid and assist it by all the means in their power'.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/mutual-defence-clause.html

“Even without the US it’s still overwhelming, and I haven’t checked recently how many F-35s and JASSMs and all the deep-strike capabilities we have.”

Who's to say the US wouldn't order Lockheed Martin to stop all software updates for European F-35s, basically turning them into more expensive F-16s?

[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“But if the Ukrainians have knocked out half of Russia’s refining capacity in six months, we could do it in six weeks and take out the other half,” he continued.

Yeah because you have the drone production capacity and knowledge Ukraine has, right? Then why do you use Jets to defend drones at the EU border?

This guy is getting nervous, and that's exactly what Putin wants. He wants to spread insecurity about supporting the Ukraine. Doubt Russia has the illusion of "defeating Europe", that is ridiculous if we look on how they are doing on the battle field in Ukraine.

[–] steel_for_humans@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

He wasn't talking about using drones. It was in context of a full scale conflict using fighter jets and bombers. And he was not referring to Poland, either, but to NATO.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The EU could increase its chances by applying a Cuba-style embargo on Russia but then Germany couldn't buy Russian gas...

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but declare where we getting gas from?

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Is Poland ready for fracking?

load more comments
view more: next ›