this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
560 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

28116 readers
226 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 72 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It’s pretty insane. Need to be prepared for any kind of weather. We had a 121F swing this year in Minneapolis. It was -21F on January 23, 2026, and 100F on July 27, 2026.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The largest recorded temperature change in one place over a 24-hour period occurred on January 15, 1972 in Loma, Montana, when the temperature rose from −54 to 49 °F (−47.8 to 9.4 °C).

Just a wild place

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Can confirm. Was in Belgrade MT one day in April where it went from -19F to 43F over the day, and it wasn't abnormal at all.

[–] dumples@piefed.social 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not even uncommon. We get that pretty much every year. People think it's cold all year around. Nope. Not at all

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's noteworthy because the frequency and extremity are becoming more frequent and more extreme.

[–] dumples@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah. For sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] D06M4@lemmy.zip 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Those could very well be some of the best places to be at if it wasn't for the heat on the hottest days (10°C colder would be much better, obviously). It's also important to keep in mind it's not the same to have a single day at +40°C than a whole month at +40°C. It's a common part of the narrative spread by negationists that we already had sudden temperature spikes recorded decades ago, conveniently ignoring the worsening sustained temperatures that have been recorded for years. Anyone with a pinch of curiosity can check the numbers.

[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I’m of the opinion that the best places to be will be those with shade and working aquifers as those become fewer and fewer

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, some of the marked locations are near the great lakes, so if having a large water source is one of the metrics those ones at least still fit.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Except the lakes are polluted already and going to get far worse, as is the land.

Bald Eagles on lake michigan only average I think like 7 or 10 years, the ones inland like 15 or 20 or something, if I recall the numbers exactly but it's a big difference and it's because of the pollution.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Most of the marked locations have significant and worsening wildfire risk

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago
[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago

America and Canada need to get that rash looked at.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Note to self: Don’t live there.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't worry it's a dry cold

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Not on the West side of the map it isn't

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks to global warming warming, that rash is spreading and it won’t be long until most live there.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The terrifying part is that adjacent to the Great Lakes was projected to be ground zero for incoming climate change refugees. Now it’s looking like they’ll be dried up

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn't west coastal be better? Water to help regulate temperature, and you don't get the hurricane effects of the eastern coast

[–] xnavy@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rising sea levels, tsunamis and earthquakes. Oh my!!!

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago

Plus, you need desalination to be able to do something with ocean water

load more comments (1 replies)

As a pretty much lifelong Wyomingite, it's not so bad. The wind is a bigger problem frankly.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm in Calgary and I remember chatting with some folks in Denver a few winters back. We were talking weather and they said "oh its super cold here right now, just hit -10 f (-23 c)" and I was like "yeah cold here too, just hit -65 with wind chill." They asked me if I meant celcius or Fahrenheit and I just said "honestly at this point it doesn't matter."

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My first apartment in Calgary had an issue with the fire alarm going off in very cold nights since it was an old style that used (in part not the whole system) a piece of metal though the wall and went off when the difference between the inside and out side was to much (IE on fire inside). The issue was that when you keep the inside at +20C and the outside is -45C the alarm goes off and everyone has to go stand outside and wait for the all clear.

That being said I will take a dry Alberta winter over a damp one any day. -40 is fine with me (not if I stand outside too long and die though). Really once you are at -20 its not much different, just die/get frost bite faster.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's more of a dry cold though!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait...

-40c == -40f

Really?

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 21 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

9/5(conversion ratio) of -40 is -72 which is 32(offset) below -40.

So... (9/5[F/C])*(-40[C])+32=-40[F] is where they meet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I took the family on a road trip through South Dakota this summer. For some reason in my mind, I thought South Dakota is north - and north is cold. Jesus fucking Christ was I wrong. It was unbearably hot. We tried going outside in the Badlands and had to get back in the car after like 5 minutes. Fuck that place and it's crazy heat.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

this summer has been unlike others. you might have done the exact same thing in half the country.

when i was a kid (seems like eons ago) we vacationed there a lot, in north and south dakota (and a little mt and wy). mom and me loved the badlands. the terrain and features, wildlife, the night sky... i don't remember it ever being "too hot" to be outside. we camped, in a tent or popup; so outside is where we were basically all the time.

[–] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

this summer is gonna be like all the others from now on, however.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

i wish.

they're gonna get worse.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the Plains get pretty hot and humid, especially with the flatness and general lack of trees. I remember a 118°F day in east-river SD in 2005 or -6, a shitty day to be a lifeguard lol. At least there's a little geography in the Badlands, and you're close to the Black Hills, which are gorgeous. But yeah, they are called the Badlands for a reason lol.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is a place in Saskatchewan that had +50c and -50C in one year. Wild that people live there, +50C is way too hot for me.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Minnesotans don’t cry, we’re tougher than that, or at least have realized that if we do they either freeze or turn to steam.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

You haven't had real winter until you've had eyelash icicles.

[–] thru_dangers_untold@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Beautiful demonstration of continentality

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How old is this map? It was -40F in Southern Michigan in 2015 or 2016 and it's definitely been 104F in the same place in recent years.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I know my home has seen both those temps in my lifetime, but is not on the map.

Maybe it's only in the same year?

[–] AfterlifeAdventures@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Gonna be a desert soon, all the over farming

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is that true on a global level?

[–] Rawrosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Where I live in Sweden I have not seen quite that spread of temperatures yet. But not far off... I have seen -43C and +35C in the same area.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Finnish here, I've (somewhat) likewise seen -45c and +38 in the same town. I preferred -45c, easily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Now break it down into 5 year blocks showing sets of stations added in each block.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Huh, Palliser's triangle.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

kinda explain why some plants from the south can also survive up there, like 1 species of cactus.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›