this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
267 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31201 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump offered a vague answer when asked about the timing of the $5,000 “Trump Dividend” checks he said his administration would send to Americans after the midterms.

The Republican, who outlined the plan last night at the GOP’s midterm convention in Texas, spoke with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham about the check plan after his speech.

During the interview, the president was asked why he was promising to send the checks after the midterms if the money was available now.

“Because the Democrats can’t do it. Because with them, it’s negative growth. With us, it’s so positive,” Trump said. “So, we’re taking in $21 trillion. No country has ever taken in anywhere near that. It’s four or five times higher than the next one. All because of that beautiful word you and I love more than most others, tariffs.”

(It is unclear what $21 trillion the president was talking about, but neither his tariffs nor investment commitments to the U.S. have brought in that much money alone during his administration.)

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 89 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He is lying. He’s just fucking lying. It wasn’t a “vague answer“. It was a big fat fucking LIE.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it a lie if it’s entirely incoherent?

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe it’s the “concept of a lie”? Lol.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We think hes trying to lie but hes too far gone to get the words out

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

He can’t even get through a whole sentence anymore. It’s absurd.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

So THAT'S what "the art of the deal" means

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Word salad. It's just freeform bullshit coming out of his puckered pie hole.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Being a speech writer for him would be so frustrating. I know there's been skits done about it. Even if you're being paid for it regardless, putting any amount of work into something and then have it be totally derailed every time...

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You think he has speech writers? I always thought they just wheel him on stage and let him loose.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago

I think he has to have something to lead into the topic. Just like LLMs, a prompt to build from, no actual thoughts beginning there.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

He's definitely drilled extensively on talking points. His wittering is always a mix of the things Fox & Friends got him riled up about, attacks on people who've contradicted him, and some Quixote-esque attempt at the points he's meant to make that week.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

They just read him a chapter from mein kampf before wheeling him out and the general tone of it makes it's way into his otherwise senile rambling.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Since 2015 Japanese translators have had so much trouble figuring out what he's saying. In the first presidency, his boisterous rhetoric filled with exaggerations was hard to put in words that would sound befitting to a leader, and not be mistaken as the translators making fun of him. In more recent years, it's his frequent repetition, primitive words and even more frequent derailing into word salad tangents that he can barely finish a coherent thought that is the challenge for translators.

For years they've pretty much given up and cut it to a 2 sentence summary each time at best. Recent example article in Japanese Recent example video

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and not be mistaken as the translators making fun of him.

Anything short of that is sanewashing him and thus a dereliction of duty on the translator's part.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is that it was totally novel and in Japanese news on international affairs especially unprecedented, virtually everything was sanewashed in the past, so it's not surprising that media and diplomatic officials in Japan were shocked and taken aback in the first couple years.

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

My god that's fucking hilarious. You could not pay me enough to be a translator.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

👨‍🚀🔫👩‍🚀

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago

A trump never pays his debts

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

THERE ARE NO CHECKS was the right answer.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking Luthor.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Someone Left My Cake Out In The Rain

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because he has no intention of sending them. Ever.

Why does anyone think he would?

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago

Surely, this time will be different!

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Completely deranged pedophile sociopath, and yet some people still think he's the second coming of christ.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Or the anti-christ, but they're still into it cause its gods will.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His supporters even wear a mark of the beast upon their brow

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

And he has(had?) a false prophet. His "spiritual advisor"

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Because they're one in the same.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

How about those Epstein files?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cause that's not how to trick people and give them nothing.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Lying liar lies again when called out on his latest lie.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Well you see what had happened was, remember that Fuhrer bunker.. er I mean ballroom the pedophile said was to be paid for by donors?

Congratulations, you're all donors!! It's not technically paid by the taxpayers WITH taxpayer money... just the other tax the dumbfucks who voted for this shit fail to understand who pays the tarrifs; hint, you do.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

“Because the Democrats can’t do it. Because with them, it’s negative growth. With us, it’s so positive,” Trump said. “So, we’re taking in $21 trillion. No country has ever taken in anywhere near that. It’s four or five times higher than the next one. All because of that beautiful word you and I love more than most others, tariffs.”

There is $167b tariff revenue for first 11 months of fiscal year. 2027 is forecast to bring in $160b. There are legal challenges to those as well. $21T needs 150 years of continuity of his crazy. Not to mention, he's threatened to bring tariff revenue to 0 by eliminating all trade next week after Fed raises interest rates.

The promise costs $1.325T. At 5% interest 10 year bond financing, total 10 year tariff hopeful revenue would still be a $387.5B net loss after then end of his 4th term :P

If "Dems really can't do it", all the more reason to do it alone now just to make sure Americans get rewarded for all the tremendous success/winning he's accomplished. Also, regardless of election results, republicans will have majority at least until January 2027.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

How DARE you do math!

[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Dementia Diaper Don at his finest.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

That dumbass has no idea what tarriffs even are. It's a buzz word that has wedged itself intl his pudding brain.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's The Power of Positive Thinking, rules 1 and 2: Picture yourself succeeding, drown out a negative thought ("Oh no my bullshit bribery idea is unworkable, illegal baloney") with a positive thought ("With them, it's negative growth, with us, it's positive").

We're just seeing that the pattern is more important to him than the quality or coherence of the thoughts involved. He has been just like this since his campaign in 2015, at least. Personally I don't think he seems any more demented than he did ten years ago. Maybe his handlers are letting him have a little more leash, because he's a useful distraction.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I've hated the guy since the first time I laid eyes on him in the late 80s. He's always been a sleazy, no-class, grifting, pedo rapist.