this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
41 points (93.6% liked)

Advent Of Code

1236 readers
1 users here now

An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev! Other challenges are also welcome!

Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.

Everybody Codes is another collection of programming puzzles with seasonal events.

EC 2025

AoC 2025

Solution Threads

M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12

Visualisations Megathread

Rules/Guidelines

Relevant Communities

Relevant Links

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

console.log('Hello World')

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year I used mainly crystal. This year I'm thinking pharo smalltalk, if I can pick it up in time

I also want to do visualizations, not sure how possible that is with smalltalk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I always use Rust, because I cannot use it at work and I am still bad with it.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

New Years resolution the past 5 years: I will get better with Rust.

...and I do get better but somehow it always feels like it's not enough. Like, I'm still an imposter.

I can program an entire embedded USB keyboard/mouse firmware from scratch that can do all sorts of things no keyboard has ever done before yet I still feel like a newbie somehow. Like there's all these people that talk about traits and mutli-threaring with async and GPU and AI stuff and I'm like, "I wrote an embedded_hal crate that lets you use both 8 and 16-channel multiplexers simultaneously!" or, "I wrote an interface that let's you use the extra space in your RP2040 flash memory as a filesystem!"

Yet everything I ever write in Rust always just uses the most basic and simple features because I still have trouble with complex lifetimes (passing them around quickly gets too confusing for me) and traits that work with non-basic types (because in the world of embedded 'static is king).

[–] arendjr@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

Good news: if you’re writing #Rust and only using basic features of the language, you’re doing it right.

People who use the advanced stuff either have unique, interesting challenges, or they’re over-engineering. Since the former are overrepresented in the blogosphere, you’re probably comparing yourself to them. But just because their problems are interesting doesn’t mean yours are not! Nor does it mean you have to use the same solutions.

If you can solve interesting problems (it sounds like you can!) and keep the code simple, more power to you!

[–] kahnclusions@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This year I'm thinking of a real challenge and writing brainfuck with butterflies.

Or Rust. Rust is the way.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Real programmers don't mess time messing around with butterflies or physically interacting with the world. They just intimidate the program into acting as they want through sheer fucking will

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm going to try with an awful language so I can better criticise it in future.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago

I will try to learn rust while doing it, seems like an up and coming language with some interesting features.

I never get past the first 10 days anyway due to how long they start to take and how many things are going on in December.

I hate the ones that turn out to require some niche mathematical knowledge too....

[–] wer2@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like to use lisp. It is about the only time I get to use it, and I get a little better each year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

I skipped 2023, but in 2022 I got decently far using newer Excel functions like LET and LAMBDA. And then if I could I would golf the solution into a single cell formula. Years before 2022 I used Python. I think I had more fun with Excel. Will I be up for it this year?

[–] zarlin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Thinking of using nim again like last year

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Going with c# again. I know the language super well but don't often have a chance to get really deep into it with the stuff at work. These often present very non typical problems that require lesser used features.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

C# is like a black hole for me. Ever since I started using it, I have been unable to really get into anything else.

If I would have learned it later, I could have learned five other languages instead ( really learned, I have still played with a bunch ).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lwhjp@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

Haskell! Because it fits the way I think nicely, and I don't want to write in anything else :)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It'll definitely be running on hardware

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Probably start with Rust again this year, although it definitely makes some of the days a lot harder. I might switch to something better for quick code if I fall too far behind.

I might even try PHP - I coded it professionally at the start of my career but haven't touched it for a decade and I'm curious to know if its improvements make it pleasant to use.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Might finally do something with Elixir. Plenty of ideas for using it with Phoenix and while I've seen a couple of tutorials for simple stuff like a live chat, I've done fuck-all thus far.

Might try V one way or another as well. Super small compiler and very small executables make me happy.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Portuguese and Gleam.

[–] reboot6675@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Go. I actually I haven't written a single line of Go since last year's AoC so it's a good excuse to go again (pun intended).

[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

I have previously done it in Rust, but have toyed with the idea of taking this year as a reason for looking into OCaml.

[–] YodaDaCoda@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I want to learn rust but I don't think I have the socks for it

[–] andioop@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Python. I don't have much fun in that language and I figure maybe doing AoC will help delete the mental barrier of "Python make sad" and also get me to learn more about it, so if it still makes me unhappy at least it won't be an "I have very little understanding of what I am doing" unhappy.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't entirely know why, but it's difficult to enjoy programming in python, even if you enjoy the end product. Something about it's design, which usually forces you to do things imperatively or reach for a library, it's position as mainly a glue language, it's philosophy of "there should only be one way to do it". They're practical philosophies, but not very fun

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

You might have put into a words a suspicion I've had for a long time. I don't know if this is completely the case for me. But yes, Python most of the times doesn't spark joy

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't code enough to justify investing time and energy into becoming fluent in a new language, andd habits die hard, so... perl. It does what I need it to do, and it is so thoroughly embedded in the back of my head that it's extremely rare that I have to look something up when writing.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Scala 3 again. More inline. More better.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hm. Want to try to use the Relational Model, but am starting to hate SQL. Anyone know of any decent alternatives?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Typically when people want to avoid sql they use an orm, but um, I'm not sure why you want to use a database for aoc

[–] CodeMonkey@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Go, out of the languages I use at work, it is the one I learned most recently and have the least experience with. I am not planning to get on the leader board (or even comple more than the first week of challenges), but it is an excuse to get more comfortable with the standard library.

[–] MeepMorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I always use R! Sometimes I sprinkle in some Rcpp (c++ with extensions for interacting with R objects).

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really curious about how'd unsupervised AutoGPT handle it. Will probably require making some kind of agent that handles input and feedback loop, and it will definitely be a disaster, but could be interesting exercise.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure AI won the first few days last year.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I'm boring and going to try kotlin and rust. Perhaps some other language too if something comes up till the first.

[–] VegOwOtenks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Some Mixture of Haskell and Python and maybe Rust if my friends get me to join them.

load more comments
view more: next ›