this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
26 points (71.0% liked)

News

39677 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Erin Piacenti, 32, was fatally stabbed by Pamela Cisneros on Aug. 31 while leaving her job at Bank of America

She had just welcomed her first child, a baby daughter, five months prior and was leaving work after her first day back from maternity leave when she was killed

Tak Kam, 68, was also stabbed but is expected to recover, and police later used lethal force on Cisneros when she charged at them with two knives in her hands

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dreksob@feddit.online 78 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Look, I get that people hate bankers.

But as far as I can tell, everything about this is just media pushing a really dumb narrative.

The lady who stabbed her was not targeting bankers, it was just a crazy person with a knife.

Banks give out VP titles to fucking everybody, this is the rough equivalent of stabbing a General Manager at Costco.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was wondering how a 32 year old was a vp.

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To get around some post 2008 regulation, banks give the title of VP to tons of ppl so they can still sign off on shady shit and comply with the law, while the real rich VPs take no risk.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Any law or regulation needs to be put to a think tank with the specific task of gaming it or finding the loopholes. Then shut that shit down. This type of shoot is predictable and annoying.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is exactly how the US became a healthcare-tied-to-enployment hellhole

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2 or 3 reasons that Banks give out VP titles like candy.

  1. Some regulation after Bush's recession tried to tie shady shit at banks to VPs, at the time, that would have tied the shady practices to the actual people doing them. Since the actual people in charge wanted to have scapegoats, they just gave the title to everyone.

  2. It makes people feel important, if they can call the bank and get a VP on the line, it makes them feel heard if they can complain to a VP etc.

  3. Its another form of wage reduction, basically they give people the VP title so the people with the title feel like they are going somewhere, but they don't actually give out raises to go with. It lets them keep people around for a bit longer without giving them any more money.

The last one has kind of stopped working since everybody knows what's going on, and once you have 5 VPs at one branch, becoming a VP becomes a lot less important, but its part of why the title became so widespread.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep that's the exact impression I am getting as well. Designed as jerkbait.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean, not to be this person but...its not the worst narrative. Theres always another shooting or senseless murder but there's been like 1 proper assignment of blame and follow thru (Luigi's case)

Look how companies are kowtowing to the very real threat Trump is to them. Compare that to how they view the public they're endlessly fucking over and social murdering without consequence or impediment.

Is it really so bad that the headline is factual if provocative/tittilating?

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 10 points 1 month ago

The narrative could be worse, but a "factual" headline can very much be used to drive a fake narrative.

In this case, the headline (while factual) is guiding the reader to think that somebody high up at Bank of America (not some random branch manager) was stabbed because she was a wealthy banker.

Its then pushing the idea that violence against wealthy bankers is terrible because they could be a mother.

Everything about the headline is driving a really bad narrative.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A pretty white woman was murdered, time for a full week of national news about it. That's tragic for her and her family, but I absolutely don't need to know about it. From a magazine most well known for ranking the looks of celebrities no less.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

But she has a BABY! Surely this is news.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This poor lady and her poor family. No one deserves this.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

I can think of some people that, if they got stabbed, I'd be like "yeah that seems fair"

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago