this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
264 points (99.6% liked)

PC Gaming

15428 readers
862 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

RIP SteamDB.

[–] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago

Oh god please no ! Noooo !

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

is it bad or very bad or fucking bad?

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 204 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

If NexusMods is anything to go by, SteamDB will soon require an account to use, with strict limits unless you pay for premium access.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 64 points 1 week ago

And then proceed to leak your username, e-mail and password.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus they're going to allow developers to hide whenever they make changes so we can track minor changes anymore

Fuck they're going to break/API Paywall IsThereAnyDeal aren't they

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 145 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In it they note SteamDB might finally gain a proper API for people to use, and there's no plans to put adverts on it.

Cool. 😃

But, they will be looking to commercialise it somehow - as they said, "SteamDB needs to make money".

Oh... 🫩 Aaaaaaaand it's fucked.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes it's fucked because running servers costs a lot of money and SteamDB runs on donations. So I hope you did donate at some point when you used their services and disapprove of this development.

[–] RadiallyAxiomatic@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Being financial able to contribute is required to validate an opinion. Just like only the wealthy should vote.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well if the opinion is „they shouldn’t be bought to sustain themselves financially“, yes.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Right, did you look up if they sold because of financial hardship? Pretty sure everything I've read has been about its owner personally suffering burnout and disillusionment with the current tech and internet landscape.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The owner can do whatever they want with their platform. I don’t feel entitled to an opinion because I never donated one cent to them.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dude...it isn't an "opinion."

https://80.lv/articles/nexus-mods-owner-acquires-steamdb-after-co-founder-struggled-with-burnout

https://kotaku.com/nexus-mods-steamdb-steam-2000730486

https://www.techspot.com/news/113712-steamdb-acquired-nexus-mods-after-13-years-independent.html

Guy was even apparently looking for a replacement for himself for years before deciding to sell after burnout. So yes, saying it is because people did not donate isn't really consistent with the evidence and explicit reasoning the owner gave. You are not only expressing an opinion, but an unsubstantiated one.

Also, yes, it is hardly fair to say that people don't have a right to feel upset that a free service has the potential to no longer be free. In fact, what you've described, the need to spend money to do so, is antithetical to the philosophy behind that model. Chill out and adopt a more understanding perspective, it is seriously less work and more effective.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I meant the opinion to feel upset about the owner selling if I didn’t invest any resources, time nor money, into the provided service. I wasn’t talking about usage of said service which shouldn’t be gatekept if one opts out of donations of course.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're still wrong even if it made sense to suggest those aren't interrelated. They're of course free to have that opinion because they're just taking the creator's own words as honest.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why shouldn’t the owner sell if they are burned out?

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

What the fuck do you think you're saying rn?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Cuz consolidation is always good for us the consumers/users!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 94 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The same NexusMods that was bought up by a shady investment agency a while ago?

[–] FlihpFlorp@piefed.zip 45 points 1 week ago

Yep, and we all knew it was as a good sign when at the initial announcement they didn’t announce who

[–] bagodogs@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, it was good while it lasted.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

The theme of this millennium.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 week ago

Is there an alternative to steamdb?

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 34 points 1 week ago
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Great. Can't wait to have to pay to use that site.

[–] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

that is so unfortunate /gen

[–] _Lory98_@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Well that sucks

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

The enshittification of the internet continues. This comes after a whole year of journalists and others sperging out about how steam charts were being weaponized by the chuds. Which I'm sure is just a coincidence!

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gleddified@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

🤮🤮🤮

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 week ago

Well shit... i guess it's time to get as much out of it as possible and start looking for an alternative.

[–] doctor0710@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's special about SteamDB that no real, fully fledged alternatives showed up yet? What would prevent someone from "forking" it?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They've been working on collecting data for a long time. They have a lot of established methods and data that a newcomer would have to do the work to replicate.

I'm not aware of anything they do being open source, so you couldn't just fork it. You'd have to start from scratch.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

you know, couldn't someone make a sort of decentralized git of game art assets and just have a client fetch the missing assets, dumping them into the steam library when it finds entries that dont have populated metadata? we dont actually need a centralized web page for this

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›