this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
4 points (83.3% liked)

TechTakes

2668 readers
103 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“More and more of our customers are telling us ‘we want to run our data centers using humanoid [robots]’ because you can run them at higher temperatures, in the dark, and all these things,” says Paul Golding, who oversees so-called physical intelligence at the chipmaker Analog Devices.

...

In Altoona, Meta worker group chats have taken on a demoralized tone, “saying we’re all going to be gone in a few years anyway because of the robots,” a person familiar with the discussions says. Even if adoption of robots proves slower than anticipated, some worry the quality of jobs available is trending downward. Two of the workers say that Meta is developing AI software and other technologies that they believe will allow it to hire lower-skilled—and thus, lower-paid—workers and centralize some roles in areas like Denver, Colorado, that are more financially advantageous to the company.

“They no longer want people who can think independently, come up with creative solutions, or perform complex troubleshooting,” one Meta data center worker says. “They want ‘smart hands,’ people who are just capable enough to follow AI instructions and not mess anything up.”

Remember, it never mattered whether the technology could replace human workers, it just mattered that we could be convinced we could possibly be replaced by them... at which point we could safely be devalued by the ruling class without it being "political".

This was always a war on the basic worth of a human being, understand it as that first and foremost... and as a speculative and "exciting" technology second.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rhamph@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

‘we want to run our data centers using humanoid [robots]’ because you can run them at higher temperatures

It’s true: these massive climate-controlled facilities are kept so cold, entirely for the benefit of the two people that are walking around at any time.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

So not only are these facilities driving up electricity prices and sucking up all the water, they're not going to provide any extra jobs in the vicinity? Genius marketing Meta.

[–] samvines@awful.systems 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"you can run them at higher temperatures, in the dark, and all these things [that we'd gladly subject humans to if we thought we could get away with it]"

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

19th C mine operators enter the chat "harumphh back in our day..."

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 1 points 8 hours ago

I think the higher temperatures thing was them accidentally letting slip that the robots are meant to be staffing secret volcano supervillain lairs instead of datacenters, which is a type of facility not really famous for running better the hotter it gets.