this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
322 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

16571 readers
1118 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The measure is aimed at reducing accidents in urban areas with heavy pedestrian traffic and narrow streets, marking a major shift in the country’s traffic rules as these roads account for around 70% of all ordinary roads nationwide.

[...] above [30 kph] the risk of pedestrians suffering fatal injuries in accidents is said to spike.

[...]

The aim of the speed limit change “is to prevent accidents by stopping dangerous driving, such as failing to slow down even on busy streets”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 4 days ago (3 children)

60 kph seems really high for residential, yikes

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 22 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The problem is also that likely no one did 60, but rather close to 70.

So for everyone thinking 30 is too low, do not fret, people will just drive 40 anyhow and that is not too slow.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Definitely. If you're not going the "customary" 10 over, people will often ride right on your ass everywhere I've driven in Japan.

Edit: I can't grammar today

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

Not in Switzerland, hehe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Surprised as that’s even faster than most places in the car-brained US. It’s “only” 48kph (30mph) on the high side and 32kph (20mph) most other places

[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

Right?? I’m in the US and was really surprised that even we consider that way too fast for residential. It’s 20mph on my street and I would be livid with anything over 30

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Japan actually does very little in the way of pedestrian or bicycle friendly road design compared to most European countries (there are a few things worth learning from IMO, just not as many as, say, the Netherlands).

It works as well as it does because of the narrow streets and how little car traffic they have (even less than the Netherlands, which does way more to try and reign in cars but has way more of them). They have so little car traffic because you have to prove you have a permanent parking space in order to buy a car, there's no on-street parking, and the public transit network is very extensive. That and the aforementioned narrow streets just make driving inconvenient compared to the other options.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (7 children)

30 km/hr means people can legally drive EV autocycles on roads.

No, the aspect ratio is correct.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Largest Japanese vheicle /s

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phant@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (16 children)

They've done this in a few areas of Melbourne. The fatal injury data is certainly a compelling case:

"the risk of fatality for a pedestrian hit by a vehicle travelling at 30km/h is around 10%, compared to approximately 40% at 40km/h and more than 80% at 50km/h."
https://acrs.org.au/evidence-supports-30km-h-speed-limits-in-school-zones/

I will admit that driving at 30km/h is pretty painful sometimes.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I will admit that driving at 30km/h is pretty painful sometimes.

That's probably street design issue.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

broader city design too, you shouldn't really have to spend much time on residential streets. It should be like a circulatory system, most of the traffic is on a small number of high-speed high-capacity through-roads and then it quickly splits apart into a bunch of smaller local streets.

[–] horse@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago

This. 30km/h is common in Germany and if the road design is good, then it feels perfectly fine.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

It's also an issue of sitting in a box being shielded from the outsides. 30 km/h on a bicycle feels very different from 30 km/h in a metal box.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Sidewalks are quite rare outside major corridors in space-constrained Japan (you're often lucky to get so much as a gutter or a hint of a shoulder to walk/cycle on), so this is an overdue move indeed.

Pictured below is a pretty normal street width/layout in both rural and urban Japan, and the street I lived on was about 30-50% narrower than even this, and had high walls on either side (zero setbacks).

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yikes. it's 60kph now on a street like that? half that seems far more reasonable, even without giant trucks and suv on the streets.

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but it's Japan. So, in my experience at least, if driers can see pedestrians they're not driving that fast at all. It would be dishonourable 😄 but seriously, they're driving carefully.

[–] Jagarico@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just passed my driving test. You're legally obligated to drive bellow 10 km/h or stop completely if there are pedestrians on roads like this.

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There we have it, everyone!

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

You know I couldn't imagine going 40 miles an hour down that road but I'm sure people do

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

My carbrain seeing the title: Wtf, 30 for normal residential areas is a bit TOO low, we have 50 in most of Europe and that's just fine

My carbrain after seeing the photo: Nah this would be 20 in my country and in the vicinity of pedestrians, at pedestrian speed. AKA you'd definitely see one of these signs.

It's wild they allowed 60 on streets like this in the first place. That must feel like street racing going down this narrow alley. I was sort of expecting a regular street with a sidewalk upon seeing the title and the fact that it used to be 60.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

are you sure you're not thinking of the default urban speed limit? That's 50kmph here in sweden too, but actual residential streets almost universally have a signed 40 or 30kmph limit.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Most residential areas in Estonia are the default urban speed limit, sometimes they're limited to 30. 40 is rare but exists too. Usually someone has to complain for speed limits to get put up.

The living street sign is in places where kids play on the street often, etc. Tbh I think more residential areas should have that, but it does come with the caveat that you need to stop the car and either exit or have a passenger enter or exit within the residential area. Passing through is not allowed, which means you can't put it on bottleneck streets unless the entire area on one side of the street is covered too

[–] teuniac_@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's going to 30km/h (20mph) in many more countries now as a result of the Stockholm Declaration on Road Safety in 2020 (later endorsed by the UN) which puts a lot of emphasis on specifically 20lm/h speed limits. In the UK there is a big push for 20mph; in Wales most roads have been made 20mph.

There are still 3,558 pedestrian deaths per year in the EU, while there are 7,080 per year in the US.

The Stockholm Declaration aims for 50% fewer road deaths in 2030 compared to 2020.

A pedestrian hit at 30 km/h has about a 90% chance of surviving, but at 50 km/h, survival drops to about 20%. So while I get the appeal of driving fast, I think it's a very reasonable measure. 1000s of deaths per year to shave minutes off arrival times is not acceptable.

Source: am cycling campaigner in the UK

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm assuming that it had stayed so high for so long precisely because almost everyode was driving well under the speed limit.

I hope so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good. It's crazy it was that high. 50 km/h is already very fast for a small street.

[–] univers3man@piefed.world 9 points 4 days ago

No more Isekai truck-kun

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago

With 20 MPH (32 km/h), this is also becoming more and more standard in residential areas in the UK.

And the resulting massive drop in numbers of fatal accidents speaks for itself.

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

idk why people writing "kilos per hour" pisses me off so much. 1000 what per hour? Surely any other letter makes more sense to remove than the actual unit??
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

everyone knows you just omit the entire thing, it's just "japan lowers speed limit from 60 to 30"

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

That's the USA for you, they have MPH so no way they use something as serious as km/h, gotta USify that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

In the us we just raise the speed limit to 65 mph in school zones and give everyone a lifted blacked out f250.

[–] john_t@feddit.fr 5 points 4 days ago

I guess it will reduce noise pollution a lot too.

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure ... will there still be enough people getting isekai'd after this change? Other worlds might run low on personnel ...

[–] pirateKaiser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

You don't need speed to kill on the road.

Source: konosuba

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 6 points 4 days ago

I thought it already went into effect. People in the Japanese countryside often drive like dickheads.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago

certainly will make bikes competitive.

load more comments
view more: next ›