this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
654 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

8692 readers
517 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

This also skips on how his sister edited his yet-unpublished works after his death, to include her German ultranationalist and antisemitic views, while he was opposed to them.

A kinda similar situation to that of Kafka, wherein Max Brod, who was supposed to burn all of Kafka's manuscripts, instead e.g. rearranged the chapters of ‘The Trial’ for no good reason, such that it probably reads way more surrealistically. I've recently listened to some kinda restored edition that attempts to put back the intended order, and while it's still a mess at times, the happenings are pretty understandable.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you have an interest in philosophy or Nietzsche, Rick Roderick is one of my favorite, and most charmingly relatable commentators. He has a whole series on Nietzsche which is very good. But he covers Nietzsche in the first episode in his "Self Under Siege" philosophy series

Highly, highly recommend!

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck yeah I am. I've got a living playlist of lectures I can add this into, thank you!

Actually I see a yt video at the top of the page here, can I watch all the episodes there as an option?

[–] Juice@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's a playlist of his Self Under Siege lectures.

These videos were such a good foundation for my own learning! And Rick Roderick was a real one. Hope you enjoy!

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

"Must be exhausting!"

[–] jangyik@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

i’m pretty sure gods and religions were invented exactly because of people were thinking there is “no higher meaning”

meaning that religion had to be a response to nihilism

[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 72 points 2 days ago (39 children)

To a few philosophers, particularly the hardcore rationalists, Nietzsche's struggle for self-ownership as meaning was, in modern terms, a truckload of copium

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach you 'bout the raising of the wrist. (Socrates himself was permanently pissed).

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Not mine. Monty Python "The Bruce's Philosophy Song".

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant Who was very rarely stable Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy little beggar Who could think you under the table David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel And Wittgenstein was a beery swine Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya 'Bout the raising of the wrist Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed John Stuart Mill, of his own free will On half a pint of brandy was particularly ill Plato, they say, could stick it away Half a crate of whiskey every day Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle Hobbes was fond of his dram And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart "I drink, therefore I am" Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed

[–] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 52 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

hedonistic meaningless living

As if a life embedded in asceticism was supposed to be any more meaningful

[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, hedonism isn't the only option, what about Epicureanism?

[–] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

Nietzsche was explicitly, spitefully against asceticism. On the Genealogy of Morals is largely about how church clerics valorized ascetic lifestyle in order to trick the public into always believing they are not doing good, when actually the church has explicitly created two moralities because the rich, powerful, and aristocratic were not expected to (and Nietzsche was not in favor of) living ascetic lives.

The whole point of this meme is that Nietzsche was a life-affirming philosopher. He absolutely did not advocate for an ascetic lifestyle because he believed the joy was the highest pursuit of human life.

Now, if you find this contradictory, well Nietzsche is an extremely contrary and frustrating writer. His writing is beautiful and prosaic, but he's endlessly skeptical In one line he is saying something so profound and affirming, and the next line ascerbic and devastating. He flatters you, makes an airtight case for the flattery, then rips it to shreds; then he rips that to shreds and he is back to flattery. I'm sort of unconvinced that he even is a philosopher, but I love his writing and prose.

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right! I'm glad to see someone thinking critically about what hedonism to fundamentslly means, rather than relying on the more pejorative usage of the term.

I realised once that, even tho I was a drug free tee totaller who didn't party or have sex much, I was still a hedonistic at that time because I played videogames as much as possible.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What would be considered hedonistic back then? Talking a walk in the woods and climbing mountains for pleasure?

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unironically, yes maybe. If it is seen as avoiding your responsibilities, and doesn't contribute to some area of society (but rather sees-to the "worship" of you yourself) then it is hedonistic

Edit: other guy said it better than me

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the text it means any choice you make that sacrifices long term benefits for instant gratification. Nietzsche was way into promoting things that give you pleasure, just not at the cost of your health and prosperity

Obviously Hedonic Philosophy isn't about that either but he wasn't thinking of hedonism as a philosophy, he was describing a problem humans have with how we make choices

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anon after reading nihilist philosophy.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh no. It turned him into anime

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 14 points 2 days ago

He should have tried warning people not to look into the abyss or something.

[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Paganism is good though. Praise wilderness!

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

(my body is devoid of worldly power but I low-key agree because physically building personal meaning and protecting the wilderness trumps all)

[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I always found his frantic fear of nihilism to be a little adolescent, like "how could humanity possibly survive the death of God? How will we live a life without inherent existential or moral purpose?" You just do, Freddy.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a quote from Futuristic Violence and Fancy Suits that I think of every time this comes up.

“You can lie to yourself, say that you never had a choice, that you weren’t cut out for this. But deep down you’ll know. You’ll know that humans aren’t cut out for anything. We cut ourselves out. Slowly, with a rusty knife. Because otherwise, here’s what’s going to happen: you’re going to die and you’re going to stand at the gates of judgment and you’re going to ask God what was the meaning of it all, and God will say, ‘I created the universe, you little shit. It was up to you to give it meaning.’”

“You really think God uses that kind of language?”

“Yes.”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Love me some quality David Wong.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just do, Freddy.

A lot of people don't.

There's a whole superstructure to religion - culture, ethics, public infrastructure, social networks, financial networks, a common history and language - that you need to supplement as you dispose of the older system.

What the European socialists discovered at the turn of the 20th century was that you can't just burn down all the churches and start over from scratch. Anarchism without some new common social foundation just ends in civil war and foreign occupation.

Subsequent generations still need a scaffolding to cling to as they mature. And if that scaffold isn't rooted in some new existential or moral foundation (or if it's rooted in a rotten one) you end up with ultra-nationalism, or Victorian mysticism, or whatever paint Ayn Rand was huffing.

[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet in almost every one of those examples the problem was people sticking to the existing religions and culture being too terrified to let go or incapable of accepting that others have moved on.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

the problem was people sticking to the existing religions

"The problem with religion is that people won't stop being religious" is circular and thought-terminating

culture being too terrified to let go or incapable of accepting that others have moved on

How do you sooth public anxieties at a national level?

How do you foster egalitarian social habits?

Seems like you'd need some kind of broad social project or moral imperitive for a nation's worth of people to align with.

[–] jangyik@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

my take on life is that yeah it doesn’t have inherent meaning, but you don’t need a meaning for everything you do. you can just enjoy being alive despite the meaninglessness, it actually gives you a lot of freedom to do whatever you want to do for the sake of it.

for the morals: just don’t bring in needless suffering, nobody choose to be here and nobody wants to suffer, the only thing we can do is to make the existing lives better

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yet here we are, celebrating people whose moral purpose is nonexistent at best and usually completely evil.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah and Kierkegaard already solved this decades before him, in exactly the way you describe (although he didn't personally think it was possible).

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Having kids (one of whom is special needs) plucked me out of the nihilism well that I was drowning in. I’m so thankful for them. Now, I don’t even have time to think or contemplate life. lol

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you accept that caring for the wellbeing of your kids is inherently meaningful then you must also accept there is meaning inherent in taking care of your own self :3

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nihilists can have, and love and care for, children.

It's all about making your own meaning, and I imagine having kids is one way a lot of people do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"That's Cute." -Machiavelli

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] majster@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some author I read said that nihilism can only be temporary and then natural evolution will be towards stoicism/pragmatism. Later she argued that pragmatism isn't so awesome either, but no concrete arguments were put forward. Quiet pragmatic

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

I don't think nihilism and pragmatism are mutually exclusive

load more comments
view more: next ›