this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
1490 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

17301 readers
2709 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Freedom for all would abolish private slave ownership and trade. There's no precedent in Roman history.

This is how dumb arguments like this one sound. Only a genocidal maniac could unironically spew nonsense like this.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck the NYT. I unsubscribed the moment they started shit talking Bernie back in the day.

As long as they keep publishing david brooks columns, they're a mouthpiece for fascism

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago

If there were two candidates I could vote for, one of them saying they would establish universal healthcare but allow private insurance to continue; and one who would establish universal healthcare and promise to abolish private insurance - I would emphatically vote for the latter.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Also, even with countries that have a public option private insurance is usually still allowed. There are zero good arguments against it and a lot of superfluous nonsense meant to muddy the waters.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The American precedent is life continuously getting worse for the 99% with no pushback

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

NYT are a fascist mouthpiece

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Most people are missing the subtext on this: they’re saying you’d wipe out an entire industry overnight and literally millions of people would be unemployed overnight. Given the pisspoor state of the welfare system in America this is actually a fairly serious issue that must be accounted for whenever a transition actually occurs. It also means a huge block of potential voters, anyone who works for Cigna, Aetna, Kaiser permanente, bcbs, etc, is going to be far more likely to oppose any such changes. Plus other related industries like medical billing and families that are dependent on these incomes

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t transition asap of course, it just means there’s a complex set of issues to navigate that honestly are never touched upon by people who propose healthcare reform. That’s how you know they aren’t serious. Either they’re proposing a system that props up these companies (ala Harris) which means the costs of medical care will not appreciably improve (America pays an insane amount of admin costs especially relative to other countries, like 5-7x as much). Or they are mentioning it with no intention to make it happen

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

"Quitting predatory business practices would abolish all predatory businesses!"

Oh no. Anyway...

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That’s peak ignorance. Plenty of countries with universal heathcare have a thriving private medical insurance industry. The thing is they cannot force the scam level prices they do in the US, because private insurance is a ‘nice to have’ instead of a ‘must have’ thing.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

This whole piece: "But then I would make less money!!"

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We even have it here. Medicare/aid supplemental insurance is a massive market.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rayyy@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

There is no president in history of insurance being so expensive and worthless.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

My insurance does that, plus charges me more than not having insurance until I hit the $13k

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

There is a precedent and it's called the VA. The military is the largest socialist organization in the US.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone needs to think of the shareholders who would need to sell their mega yachts because of this madness.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am 100% in favor of universal health care. But as a realist I also recognize there are millions of people who work in the health insurance industry who would become unemployed. So that is an issue that would need to be addressed as well. Because a massive increase in unemployment depresses wages for everyone.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

Replacing private insurance with medicare would likely need lot of office work and infrastructure so it could absorb some of it. They might also be allowed to transform into smaller scale companies that outsurce their services to the government for these purposes (though they would likely need to downsize). After working in such a hell hole though, some of them might need some workshops in empathy.

In any case agreed they should look out for folks affected by such a fallout but CEOs and upper management can go lip up Trump's diarrhea for all I care.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except in every civilized country in the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

We have generations of data from countries all over the world with universal healthcare. It costs the people less, undeniably; there's zero benefit to for-profit private insurance... for people, anyway (not corporations).

I'm not positive, but I think USA is the last "western nation" without it. So... US taxpayers actually send billions to other nations all over the globe, all of which have better healthcare. Nice.

Even Mexico has universal healthcare, soon they'll be trying to end American migration...

Oh my God, it just dawned on me. Trump was right... Mexico will pay for the wall! Trump's lowering US citizen's standard of living severely so that they will have flee over the border by the millions and viola! Wall.

Brilliant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If everything had to have precedent, nothing would ever change.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You just described why conservatives exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 149 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And still tries to decline your claims.

My sister had her gallbladder removed a decade or two ago. It was basically exploding or something in the er. Really disgusting amounts of pain.

Anyway, she was immediately denied as they couldn't determine whether her gallbladder removal was elective or not. The doctor said something like "well fuck that, that's why we have a team of lawyers."

I think that's a pretty succinct summary. Without one or more lawyers at your disposal we might as well all get fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

oh no, my private insurance, which only gave life saving measure to an astonishing number of people who are alive and thriving today because one of their CEOs got shot in the fucking face, deservedly

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 days ago (5 children)

A national law against child labor was passed in 1916, but it was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1918. A 1919 law was also overturned. In the 1920s, an effort to pass a constitutional amendment failed, because of opposition from the South and from Catholics. The Fair Labor Standards Act (part of the New Deal) in 1938 finally ended child labor in factories, mines, and other occupations. Child labor has always been a factor in agriculture and that continues into the 21st century. — Wikipedia

Something tells me if we did a complete archive search of NYT (and, for that matter, WSJ), circa 1910-1940, we'd find that it has, indeed, defended child labor in the US.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Stopping the orphan crushing machine would abolish the orphan crushing industry. There's no precedent in American history.

Medicare for All would save a trillion dollars and 114,000 American lives, both annually. Fuck the insurance racket.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“Abolish?” Pshaw. People even have private insurance in the EU under full government healthcare.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 117 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If you were still wondering if the NYT shills for the oligarchs…

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›