this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
134 points (94.7% liked)

The Onion and other satire w/ layers

2701 readers
369 users here now

For posting satire from The Onion and other similar sources.

redundancy, but not for its own sake


Human crafted content only please! If reporting a violation or suspicious content please provide evidence in the report or a direct message. Thank you.


Be nice. All instance rules apply.


Rules:

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Règles :

  • Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
  • Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
  • Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
  • Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Not sure how this is an “onion” story. This is pretty much what actually happened.

[–] Octavio@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

So their idea is taking a real story and writing it up as if it were an Onion-type story. I get it. OK. I can't say I like it. But apparently that's a thing now.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

This is just what the OP considers to be "satire". He will argue it to death if confronted.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

Claiming something is or isn’t an onion story without reading the story is certainly a choice

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wrong sub, this is for nottheonion as this is actual reality

[–] Dispassionate@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago

Did you read the article text?

[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean, I sometimes think that the world would be better if computing and bandwidth speeds stopped getting faster in 1999.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 3 days ago

I’d be down to go back to 1999.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Honestly, I'd like the current speed, but with dial-up levels of complexity to set it up. I'm fully up for gatekeeping the internet from people without technical skills

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I tend to agree with this joke FCC. The internet is fast enough in most places. My cable company kept trying to sell me a faster package and I didn't really think I'd notice the difference.

What needs to happen is: rural areas need better broadband, and prices need to come down--both things that would be helped along greatly if internet were regulated as the utility it is.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cable? So its capped at 30mbs up... atleast thats what Spectrum here caps at.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It was the cheapest-ass internet they would agree to sell me and I never ran into trouble streaming at 1080p or getting my torrents quickly.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

By streaming, do you mean watching a stream? Or being a streamer. Because those are very different requirements.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Ah, yes, referring to streaming on the downlink, watching netflix, etc.

[–] Dispassionate@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago

If we reduce everyone to 56k modem speeds, then rural areas will become faster by comparison.