this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
117 points (99.2% liked)

Plumbing

288 readers
8 users here now

A place for Plumbers and those interested in Plumbing to ask questions and discuss the trade.

Community guidelines:

If you have a plumbing question please include a picture in your post.

If you have a question such as "does this look correct?" please include the code your area adheres to. If you're not sure please include state/province/country you're in. Codes can vary state to state and what's wrong in one area may be perfectly acceptable in another.

Just as codes vary, prices do too. That's why we won't discuss any pricing because there's so many factors that can't or shouldn't be conveyed to strangers over the internet.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

If houses were built to be more maintainable, you wouldn't see this sort of thing.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Honestly I don't think we should be embedding plumbing and electrics INSIDE walls. Such conduits should be wall-mounted so we can monitor their condition, repair things easier, and gaze at the wonders of modernity.

They're embedded in walls from an era of "propperness" and victorian housewives. We need a cyberpunk turn in home design. It's long over due but instead people are trying to hide their sinks and smooth over electrical outlets so they can further take things for granted.

I want to see the pipes!

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The reason we put them in the walls is so they don’t get pulled or damaged, which creates an electrocution and/or fire hazard.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago

but like, that's why we invented conduits! They're walls for the cables/pipes!

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As someone who just had to have a wall torn out to repair a pipe, having it on the outside would've saved me so much time, money, and damage.

Where you lost me was blaming housewives for causing pipes to be put behind walls.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think the era was housewives, not the cause.

But yeah conduits should be ran outside walls and decoritively integrated into the design of the space. Additionally, they should be easily accessible when maintenance is needed.

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno I kind of like it when my water keeps running and the pipes don’t burst even when it’s freezing outside

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was referring more to internal pipes. If the pipes were displayed on top of the walls instead of inside it, repairs would be easier, and leaks would be caught faster. If a pipe wasn't going to freeze inside a wall, it certainly shouldn't freeze inside the house.

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

That does make more sense.

I lived for a while in Australia in a house with water pipes running on the outside and I found that shocking.

We pay a LOT, in terms of time and complexity, for having nice smooth pretty interior walls.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When houses were first retrofitted with electricity, they ran the wires on the walls, not inside them.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

this is one of those big little things your hind brain notices and makes you go "man this house feels old, somehow"

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

My college dorm was an old stone building that had been a Civil War hospital, so it was built before indoor plumbing or electricity. Luckily, it also had high ceilings, so all the pipes and conduits were all exposed above us. There was a pipe just outside my dorm room door, and whenever I'd go out, I'd jump up and do 10 pull ups.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That's probably on the other side of OPs picture

[–] lepthesr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't see the problem here

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Coulda gone with one less hole. That's just more work.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Nah, think of the shape the hose would make. You need a trap so when it's not connected to your faucet, you don't have a bug highway into your kitchen

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I'd say it's a pretty solid £35's worth of plumbing