context, this is from a 1992 anti piracy video "don't copy that floppy" https://youtu.be/up863eQKGUI
You wouldnt use crack would you?
Why yes I would
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
115 points (95.3% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
70221 readers
225 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Wouldn't the camera angle have to change horizontally instead of subject changing positions?
Yes
it's different than normal 3d images, but it still has a surprising amount of depth for a video, try it!
Sorry, I actually don't see it... At least not in a very significant way. The reason why we see 3d is because we have two cameras (eyes) side by side looking at objects from slightly different perspectives, right? I'm no expert, but one stationary camera with one dude moving in front of it shouldn't cause a stereoscopic effect even if you take two frames of it (unless he's rotating, maybe).
It's kinda like having an image of pacman with his mouth open and another with his mouth half way closed, crossing you eyes and saying you see him as a sphere. Edit: Or, they wouldn't need special stereoscopic cameras for movies, they could just play two of the same videos one frame out of sync and call it a day. Maybe?
If an expert can prove me wrong, I'll shut my mouth.
It's surprisingly simple, if you have two cameras side by side, you're capturing two images where the camera is moved horizontally relative to the subject. If you now instead take two pictures where you move the subject horizontally relative to the camera, you're achieving the same effect on the subject in the images. This means you won't get a correct effect on every video, and the background will be unaffected, but it can work.
Neat!
Omg those moves
Class traitor.
The days of running a program on two 1541 drives' own RAM so they could be daisy-chained together to be an assembly line of duplication.
20 years ago a friend of mine mixed that old video with Cadence Weapon's "30 Seconds" and named it "copy that floppy"